Description
Action research is only valuable in its implementation. Using action research as a springboard for collaboration in an organization, you can initiate positive organizational change that will benefit all stakeholders. Communicating your results effectively is a vital part of any successful research plan.
For this assignment, use the action plan proposal from Topic 5 as the basis for a 5-7 minute video presentation to share with colleagues, administrators, and other stakeholders in the organization.
You may use any video platform you choose, (e.g., your phone, Windows Movie Maker, iMovie, GoAnimate, Powtoon, Adobe Spark). The video must be engaging, visually appealing, and designed to encourage collaboration in your action plan.
Include the following in your presentation:
- Brief description of the action plan you propose
- Overview of the data used to create the action plan
- Role each stakeholder will play in the action plan and timetable for implementation
- Expected outcomes and benefits to the organization and the stakeholders
In addition, write a 250-500 word reflection discussing how the action research process may apply to your future professional practice.
If your video was not created with an online source that hosts it, use an online video platform such as Loom, YouTube, or Vimeo to upload your completed video. If you upload your video to YouTube, select the “unlisted” option.
Submit the link to your video along with your reflection.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance
TCH-539
Class Code
TCH-539-O500
Criteria
Criteria
Percentage
100.0%
Action Plan Summary
15.0%
Data Overview
15.0%
Stakeholders’ Roles and Timetable
10.0%
Outcomes and Benefits
20.0%
Reflection
20.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Organization
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
10.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Sharing the Action Research Project
No Submission (0.00%)
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Total Points
125.0
Insufficient (69.00%)
Video fails to describe the proposed action plan.
The overview of data is incomplete.
The roles of each stakeholder and the timetable for
completion are unrealistic.
Outcome and benefits implementing the proposal would
have for the organization and stakeholders is unconvincing.
Fails to discuss how the action research process may be
applied to future professional practice.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the
sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are
compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Approaching (74.00%)
Video includes minimal information or extraneous
information not related to the proposed action plan.
The overview of data is marginal.
The roles of each stakeholder and the timetable for
completion are partially proficient.
Outcome and benefits implementing the proposal would
have for the organization and stakeholders is overly
simplistic.
Superficially discusses how the action research process may
be applied to future professional practice.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
The content is adequately organized, generally providing the
audience with a sense of the main idea.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Acceptable (87.00%)
Video appropriately and concisely describes the proposed
action plan.
The overview of data is complete and credible.
The roles of each stakeholder and the timetable for
completion are detailed.
Outcome and benefits implementing the proposal would
have for the organization and stakeholders is logical and
measurable.
Provides relevant examples of how the action research
process may be applied to future professional practice.
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not
hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence
structures are used, as well as some practice and contentrelated language.
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate
to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear
sense of the main idea.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Target (100.00%)
Video professionally describes the proposed action plan.
The overview of data is in-depth.
The roles of each stakeholder and the timetable for
completion demonstrate complex connections.
Outcome and benefits implementing the proposal would
have for the organization and stakeholders is advanced and
creative.
Provides new insight of how the action research process may
be applied to future professional practice.
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice
reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related
language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Comments
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a
sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The
content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the
audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
