Description
Before making a case for an evidence‐based project, it is essential to understand the culture of the organization in order to begin assessing its readiness for EBP implementation. Select an appropriate organizational culture survey tool and use this instrument to assess the organization’s readiness.
- Develop an analysis of 250 words from the results, addressing your organization’s readiness level, possible project barriers and facilitators, as well as how to integrate clinical inquiry.
- Make sure to include the rationale for the survey categories scores that were significantly high and low, incorporating details and/or examples. Also explain how to integrate clinical inquiry into the organization, providing strategies that strengthen the organizations weaker areas.
- Submit a summary of your results. The actual survey results do not need to be included.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, revise “Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment” for your final paper submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.
NUR-699
Class Code
NUR-699-O501
Criteria
Percentage
Organizational
Culture
and
Assessment100.0%
Describe
the results
from
theReadiness
organizational
culture survey you selected, addressing the
readiness level of your organization. Provide an
analysis of any possible project barriers and
facilitators, and describe how to integrate clinical
inquiry into your organization.
100.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
The survey results are listed without an in-depth explanation.
Analysis of the project barriers and facilitators is not outlined
or is outlined poorly. Clinical inquiry is defined and/or broad
statements are made about it, but the individual organization
being assessed is not specifically addressed. Inaccurate
comprehension of material is revealed, as is the lack of ability
60.0
Less than Satisfactory (80.00%)
The survey results are listed without an in-depth explanation.
The project barriers and facilitators are ignored or
superficially evaluated. Unwarranted conclusions are drawn.
Clinical inquiry is defined and/or broad statements are made
about it, but the individual organization being assessed is not
specifically addressed. A lack of comprehension is displayed,
Satisfactory (88.00%)
A basic survey overview is provided, but any rationale,
details, and/or examples are minimally included. A surface
level of evaluation of the possible project barriers and
facilitators is conducted. Very narrow focus is provided.
Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported but not
developed in-depth. How to integrate a basic idea of clinical
Good (92.00%)
Information in relation to the survey categories which scored
high and low on the survey is provided. The rationale for the
scores, including details and/or examples, is stated. Analysis
on the project barriers and facilitators is direct, competent,
and appropriately aligned to the survey. How to integrate a
basic idea of clinical inquiry into the organization is explained,
Excellent (100.00%)
Comments
Detailed information in relation to the survey categories that
scored high and low on the survey is provided. The rationale
for the scores, including details and/or examples, is provided.
The major project barriers and facilitators are thoughtfully
analyzed and evaluated. Warranted conclusions are drawn.
An informed position on how to integrate clinical inquiry into
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
