Description
Please follow the rubric exceed expectation in order to acheive this assignment. Use the Apa format
LE004: Analyzing Policies From Diverse Perspectives: Analyze a policy from the diverse perspectives of
policymakers, interest groups, healthcare administrators, and other stakeholders to assess impact on an organization.
Assessment Rubric
Rubric Criteria
Needs Improvement
Part 1: Policy Assessment
Learning Objective
Response does not explain or
does not fully or accurately
1.1:
explain the issue addressed by
Describe the issue
the policy.
addressed by a health
policy.
Learning Objective
1.2:
Explain the
background of the
policy formulation.
Response does not explain or
does not adequate explain the
background of the policy’s
formulation.
Meets Expectations
Response accurately and
succinctly describes the issue
addressed by the policy.
Response describes two
relevant current issues or
ongoing concerns related to
this policy.
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Response provides adequate
and succinct background of
the policy’s formulation.
The interpretation includes 12 substantively written
paragraphs.
.
Response uses two or more
examples of the policy in
action to demonstrate an
understanding of formulation
of health policy at state or
federal level.
© 2020 Walden University
Exceeds Expectations
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response describes more
than two relevant current
issues or ongoing
concerns related to this
policy.
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response uses three or
more examples of the
policy in action to
demonstrate an
understanding of
formulation of health
policy at state or federal
level.
1
Rubric Criteria
Learning Objective
1.3:
Describe the role of
government agencies
in the evolution,
formulation, and
implementation of a
health policy.
Needs Improvement
Meets Expectations
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Response does not address or
Response identifies the key
insufficiently addresses the role of government agencies
specific government agencies
(including public health
and officials in the formulation of
agencies) and officials
this policy.
involved in the formulation
and implementation of this
policy.
Response describes the roles
that these government
agencies and officials played
throughout the process.
Learning Objective
1.4:
Explain the diverse
perspectives of key
stakeholders involved
in the evolution,
formulation, and
implementation of the
policy.
© 2020 Walden University
Response does not explain or
inadequately and/or inaccurately
explains the diverse perspectives
of the key stakeholders.
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Response accurately and
fairly explains two diverse
perspectives of key
stakeholders including
government agencies and
officials with regard to the
health policy.
Response provides one
rationale for each stakeholder
perspective.
Exceeds Expectations
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response describes two
constraints that
government agencies
faced in formulating and
implementing this policy.
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response accurately and
fairly explains three
diverse perspectives of
key stakeholders including
government agencies and
officials with regard to the
health policy.
2
Rubric Criteria
Needs Improvement
Learning Objective
1.5:
Describe the ongoing
role of law and
regulation in the
evolution, formulation,
and implementation of
a health policy.
Response does not identify or
identifies fewer than four accurate
examples of the role of law and
regulation in the formulation and
implementation of the health
policy.
Learning Objective
1.6:
Describe key national
or state stakeholders
involved in the
evolution of the policy.
Meets Expectations
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Exceeds Expectations
Response provides one
rationale for each
stakeholder perspective.
Response identifies four
examples of the role of law
and regulation in the
formulation and
implementation of the health
policy.
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response describes two
constraints to implementing
the policy that arose from a
legal or regulatory
perspective
Response does not describe,
unclearly describes, or
insufficiently describes key
national or state stakeholders
involved in the evolution of the
policy.
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Response clearly and
sufficiently describes key
national or state stakeholders
involved in the evolution of
the policy.
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
© 2020 Walden University
Response describes more
than two constraints to
implementing the policy
that arose from a legal or
regulatory perspective.
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response describes two
constraints that national or
state stakeholders faced
in the evolution of this
policy.
3
Rubric Criteria
Learning Objective
1.7: Categorize health
policy stakeholders as
advocacy groups or
business interests.
Needs Improvement
Response does not categorize
stakeholders or inaccurately
categorized stakeholders as
advocacy groups or business
interests. Insufficient or incorrect
rationale is provided for
categorizations.
Meets Expectations
Response accurately places
at least four stakeholders
into two categories: advocacy
groups and business
interests.
Rationale is provided for the
categorizations.
Explanation is provided as to
why these categorizations
matter.
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Learning Objective
1.8:
Analyze the difference
between advocacy
groups and business
interests.
Response does not explain or
unclearly or inaccurately explains
the difference between advocacy
groups and business interests.
Response clearly and
accurately explains the
difference between advocacy
groups and business
interests.
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
© 2020 Walden University
Exceeds Expectations
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response accurately
places at least six
stakeholders into two
categories: advocacy
groups and business
interests.
Rationale is provided for
the categorizations.
Explanation is provided as
to why these
categorizations matter.
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response clearly and
accurately explains the
perspective of advocacy
groups and business
interests on the evolution
and formulation of
policies.
4
Rubric Criteria
Learning Objective
1.9:
Analyze the impact of
a health policy on key
local organizations
and stakeholders.
Needs Improvement
Response does not identify,
insufficiently or inaccurately
identifies how key local
organizations and stakeholders
are impacted by the health policy
selected.
Meets Expectations
Rationale sufficiently and
accurately identifies how
three key local organizations
and stakeholders are
impacted by the health policy
selected.
Response provides rationale
for selecting these
organizations and
stakeholders and describes
how they will be impacted.
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Learning Objective
1.10:
Explain the
overarching diverse
perspectives of the
organizational
stakeholders with
regard to the policy.
© 2020 Walden University
Response does not explain or in
adequately and/or inaccurately
explains the diverse perspectives
of the organizations and
stakeholders with regard to the
policy.
Response accurately and
fairly explains the diverse
perspectives of the three
organizations and
stakeholders with regard to
the policy.
Response provides one
rationale for each
perspective.
Exceeds Expectations
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Rationale sufficiently and
accurately identifies how
four key local
organizations and
stakeholders are impacted
by the health policy
selected.
Response provides
rationale for selecting
these organizations and
stakeholders and
describes how they will be
impacted.
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response accurately and
fairly explains the diverse
perspectives of the four
organizations and
stakeholders with regard
to the policy.
5
Rubric Criteria
Needs Improvement
Rubric Criteria
Needs Improvement
Part 2: Letter to a Policymaker
Learning
Response does not explain or
Objective 2.1:
insufficiently explains the
Explain the
relevance of the policy to the
relevance of a
organization or community.
health policy to an
organization or
community.
Learning
Objective 2.2:
Describe the
expected impact of
a policy on
organizational or
community
outcomes.
© 2020 Walden University
Response does not describe,
insufficiently or inaccurately
describes the expected impact of
a policy on organizational or
community outcomes.
Meets Expectations
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Meets Expectations
Exceeds Expectations
Response provides one
rationale for each
perspective.
Exceeds Expectations
Response sufficiently explains
Response demonstrates
the relevance of the policy to the the same level of
organization or community.
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response is supported by
references to relevant academic
resources.
Response describes one
constraint the policy will
place on the organization
or community.
Response sufficiently and
accurately describes the
expected impact of a health
policy on organizational or
community outcomes.
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response is supported by
references to relevant academic
resources.
Response provides at
least one example of how
the policy will have a
positive or negative impact
on the organizational
outcome.
6
© 2020 Walden University
7
Overview
In this Assessment, you will conduct an analysis of a health policy from the
many diverse stakeholder perspectives involved.
Instructions
Access the following to complete this Assessment:
•
Academic Writing Expectations Checklist
Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the
same rubric the assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides
detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many
students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the
rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.
To complete the Work Product Assessment, you will select a recent (within
the last 15 years) national or state health policy that has had substantial
impact on healthcare consumers. Specifically, you will be looking at a highimpact health policy to analyze the diverse and divergent perspectives that
informed its development and then assess its impact at the local
organizational level.
Rubric
This Assessment requires submission of one (1) document that includes your
responses to both prompts Save this file as LE004_firstinitial_lastname (for
example, LE004_J_Smith).
When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use
the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu.
Note: You may not choose HRRP as a topic as this is covered in a previous
assessment.
After choosing a health policy, select a local healthcare organization that
is impacted by that policy. This might be a public agency, a healthcare
facility, or any organization substantially influenced by the policy. It might
also be the healthcare organization in which you work. You will evaluate
the impact of the policy on the organization’s operations and outcomes.
You will also write a letter to a policymaker who has influence over the
action of the policy. This task requires you to take a large and complex
topic (the policy) and synthesize it into digestible information that can be
used to inform the policymaker of issues raised by the policy.
This assessment has two-parts. Click each of the items below to complete this
assessment.
Part 1: Policy Assessment
•
In a 5- to 7-page report:
1. Provide the name of the policy and clearly explain the issue
addressed by the policy.
2. Explain the background of the policy’s formulation – what is the
purpose of the policy?
3. Explain the role and diverse perspectives of various government
agencies and officials, including public health agencies, in the
evolution, formulation, and implementation of the policy.
4. Determine the ongoing role of law and regulation in the evolution,
formulation, and implementation of the policy.
5. Describe key national or state stakeholders involved in the
evolution of the policy.
6. Categorize which of the stakeholders would be considered advocacy
groups and which would be classified as business interests. Explain
how you differentiate the two categories and why this differentiation
matters.
7. Identify how key local organizations and stakeholders are impacted
by this policy.
8. Explain the overarching diverse perspectives of the local
organizations and stakeholders with regard to the policy.
Part 2: Letter to a Policy Maker
•
Identify a policymaker who is a member of the U.S. Congress from your
state of residence. If you are from a territory, you will identify the
equivalent legislative person. If you are an international student, you may
choose any person who is responsible for enacting healthcare policies or
laws in your area. You will write a letter to the policymaker that focuses on
the policy and organizations or communities it may impact, in support of or
opposition to the issue you selected. Your letter should be written in a
respectful tone and focus on the evidence supporting your position,
instead of merely expressing your personal thoughts and opinions. You
must also provide evidence from the peer-reviewed literature to support
•
your position. The letter should use a professional letter format, including
salutation and address.
In a 1- to 2-page letter:
o Explain the relevance of the health policy to an organization or your
community.
o Describe the expected impact of the policy on organizational or
community outcomes.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
policymakers, interest groups, healthcare administrators, and other stakeholders to assess impact on an organization.
Assessment Rubric
Rubric Criteria
Needs Improvement
Part 1: Policy Assessment
Learning Objective
Response does not explain or
does not fully or accurately
1.1:
explain the issue addressed by
Describe the issue
the policy.
addressed by a health
policy.
Learning Objective
1.2:
Explain the
background of the
policy formulation.
Response does not explain or
does not adequate explain the
background of the policy’s
formulation.
Meets Expectations
Response accurately and
succinctly describes the issue
addressed by the policy.
Response describes two
relevant current issues or
ongoing concerns related to
this policy.
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Response provides adequate
and succinct background of
the policy’s formulation.
The interpretation includes 12 substantively written
paragraphs.
.
Response uses two or more
examples of the policy in
action to demonstrate an
understanding of formulation
of health policy at state or
federal level.
© 2020 Walden University
Exceeds Expectations
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response describes more
than two relevant current
issues or ongoing
concerns related to this
policy.
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response uses three or
more examples of the
policy in action to
demonstrate an
understanding of
formulation of health
policy at state or federal
level.
1
Rubric Criteria
Learning Objective
1.3:
Describe the role of
government agencies
in the evolution,
formulation, and
implementation of a
health policy.
Needs Improvement
Meets Expectations
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Response does not address or
Response identifies the key
insufficiently addresses the role of government agencies
specific government agencies
(including public health
and officials in the formulation of
agencies) and officials
this policy.
involved in the formulation
and implementation of this
policy.
Response describes the roles
that these government
agencies and officials played
throughout the process.
Learning Objective
1.4:
Explain the diverse
perspectives of key
stakeholders involved
in the evolution,
formulation, and
implementation of the
policy.
© 2020 Walden University
Response does not explain or
inadequately and/or inaccurately
explains the diverse perspectives
of the key stakeholders.
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Response accurately and
fairly explains two diverse
perspectives of key
stakeholders including
government agencies and
officials with regard to the
health policy.
Response provides one
rationale for each stakeholder
perspective.
Exceeds Expectations
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response describes two
constraints that
government agencies
faced in formulating and
implementing this policy.
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response accurately and
fairly explains three
diverse perspectives of
key stakeholders including
government agencies and
officials with regard to the
health policy.
2
Rubric Criteria
Needs Improvement
Learning Objective
1.5:
Describe the ongoing
role of law and
regulation in the
evolution, formulation,
and implementation of
a health policy.
Response does not identify or
identifies fewer than four accurate
examples of the role of law and
regulation in the formulation and
implementation of the health
policy.
Learning Objective
1.6:
Describe key national
or state stakeholders
involved in the
evolution of the policy.
Meets Expectations
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Exceeds Expectations
Response provides one
rationale for each
stakeholder perspective.
Response identifies four
examples of the role of law
and regulation in the
formulation and
implementation of the health
policy.
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response describes two
constraints to implementing
the policy that arose from a
legal or regulatory
perspective
Response does not describe,
unclearly describes, or
insufficiently describes key
national or state stakeholders
involved in the evolution of the
policy.
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Response clearly and
sufficiently describes key
national or state stakeholders
involved in the evolution of
the policy.
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
© 2020 Walden University
Response describes more
than two constraints to
implementing the policy
that arose from a legal or
regulatory perspective.
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response describes two
constraints that national or
state stakeholders faced
in the evolution of this
policy.
3
Rubric Criteria
Learning Objective
1.7: Categorize health
policy stakeholders as
advocacy groups or
business interests.
Needs Improvement
Response does not categorize
stakeholders or inaccurately
categorized stakeholders as
advocacy groups or business
interests. Insufficient or incorrect
rationale is provided for
categorizations.
Meets Expectations
Response accurately places
at least four stakeholders
into two categories: advocacy
groups and business
interests.
Rationale is provided for the
categorizations.
Explanation is provided as to
why these categorizations
matter.
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Learning Objective
1.8:
Analyze the difference
between advocacy
groups and business
interests.
Response does not explain or
unclearly or inaccurately explains
the difference between advocacy
groups and business interests.
Response clearly and
accurately explains the
difference between advocacy
groups and business
interests.
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
© 2020 Walden University
Exceeds Expectations
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response accurately
places at least six
stakeholders into two
categories: advocacy
groups and business
interests.
Rationale is provided for
the categorizations.
Explanation is provided as
to why these
categorizations matter.
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response clearly and
accurately explains the
perspective of advocacy
groups and business
interests on the evolution
and formulation of
policies.
4
Rubric Criteria
Learning Objective
1.9:
Analyze the impact of
a health policy on key
local organizations
and stakeholders.
Needs Improvement
Response does not identify,
insufficiently or inaccurately
identifies how key local
organizations and stakeholders
are impacted by the health policy
selected.
Meets Expectations
Rationale sufficiently and
accurately identifies how
three key local organizations
and stakeholders are
impacted by the health policy
selected.
Response provides rationale
for selecting these
organizations and
stakeholders and describes
how they will be impacted.
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Learning Objective
1.10:
Explain the
overarching diverse
perspectives of the
organizational
stakeholders with
regard to the policy.
© 2020 Walden University
Response does not explain or in
adequately and/or inaccurately
explains the diverse perspectives
of the organizations and
stakeholders with regard to the
policy.
Response accurately and
fairly explains the diverse
perspectives of the three
organizations and
stakeholders with regard to
the policy.
Response provides one
rationale for each
perspective.
Exceeds Expectations
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Rationale sufficiently and
accurately identifies how
four key local
organizations and
stakeholders are impacted
by the health policy
selected.
Response provides
rationale for selecting
these organizations and
stakeholders and
describes how they will be
impacted.
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response accurately and
fairly explains the diverse
perspectives of the four
organizations and
stakeholders with regard
to the policy.
5
Rubric Criteria
Needs Improvement
Rubric Criteria
Needs Improvement
Part 2: Letter to a Policymaker
Learning
Response does not explain or
Objective 2.1:
insufficiently explains the
Explain the
relevance of the policy to the
relevance of a
organization or community.
health policy to an
organization or
community.
Learning
Objective 2.2:
Describe the
expected impact of
a policy on
organizational or
community
outcomes.
© 2020 Walden University
Response does not describe,
insufficiently or inaccurately
describes the expected impact of
a policy on organizational or
community outcomes.
Meets Expectations
Response is supported by
references to relevant
academic resources.
Meets Expectations
Exceeds Expectations
Response provides one
rationale for each
perspective.
Exceeds Expectations
Response sufficiently explains
Response demonstrates
the relevance of the policy to the the same level of
organization or community.
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response is supported by
references to relevant academic
resources.
Response describes one
constraint the policy will
place on the organization
or community.
Response sufficiently and
accurately describes the
expected impact of a health
policy on organizational or
community outcomes.
Response demonstrates
the same level of
achievement as “Meets,”
plus the following:
Response is supported by
references to relevant academic
resources.
Response provides at
least one example of how
the policy will have a
positive or negative impact
on the organizational
outcome.
6
© 2020 Walden University
7
Overview
In this Assessment, you will conduct an analysis of a health policy from the
many diverse stakeholder perspectives involved.
Instructions
Access the following to complete this Assessment:
•
Academic Writing Expectations Checklist
Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the
same rubric the assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides
detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many
students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the
rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.
To complete the Work Product Assessment, you will select a recent (within
the last 15 years) national or state health policy that has had substantial
impact on healthcare consumers. Specifically, you will be looking at a highimpact health policy to analyze the diverse and divergent perspectives that
informed its development and then assess its impact at the local
organizational level.
Rubric
This Assessment requires submission of one (1) document that includes your
responses to both prompts Save this file as LE004_firstinitial_lastname (for
example, LE004_J_Smith).
When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use
the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu.
Note: You may not choose HRRP as a topic as this is covered in a previous
assessment.
After choosing a health policy, select a local healthcare organization that
is impacted by that policy. This might be a public agency, a healthcare
facility, or any organization substantially influenced by the policy. It might
also be the healthcare organization in which you work. You will evaluate
the impact of the policy on the organization’s operations and outcomes.
You will also write a letter to a policymaker who has influence over the
action of the policy. This task requires you to take a large and complex
topic (the policy) and synthesize it into digestible information that can be
used to inform the policymaker of issues raised by the policy.
This assessment has two-parts. Click each of the items below to complete this
assessment.
Part 1: Policy Assessment
•
In a 5- to 7-page report:
1. Provide the name of the policy and clearly explain the issue
addressed by the policy.
2. Explain the background of the policy’s formulation – what is the
purpose of the policy?
3. Explain the role and diverse perspectives of various government
agencies and officials, including public health agencies, in the
evolution, formulation, and implementation of the policy.
4. Determine the ongoing role of law and regulation in the evolution,
formulation, and implementation of the policy.
5. Describe key national or state stakeholders involved in the
evolution of the policy.
6. Categorize which of the stakeholders would be considered advocacy
groups and which would be classified as business interests. Explain
how you differentiate the two categories and why this differentiation
matters.
7. Identify how key local organizations and stakeholders are impacted
by this policy.
8. Explain the overarching diverse perspectives of the local
organizations and stakeholders with regard to the policy.
Part 2: Letter to a Policy Maker
•
Identify a policymaker who is a member of the U.S. Congress from your
state of residence. If you are from a territory, you will identify the
equivalent legislative person. If you are an international student, you may
choose any person who is responsible for enacting healthcare policies or
laws in your area. You will write a letter to the policymaker that focuses on
the policy and organizations or communities it may impact, in support of or
opposition to the issue you selected. Your letter should be written in a
respectful tone and focus on the evidence supporting your position,
instead of merely expressing your personal thoughts and opinions. You
must also provide evidence from the peer-reviewed literature to support
•
your position. The letter should use a professional letter format, including
salutation and address.
In a 1- to 2-page letter:
o Explain the relevance of the health policy to an organization or your
community.
o Describe the expected impact of the policy on organizational or
community outcomes.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Categories: