Description
Comprehensive Professional Development Plan
Reading/Literacy specialists are often responsible for developing comprehensive professional development plans to support teachers as they work to improve students’ reading and writing skills. These professional development plans go beyond single sessions into deeper, job-embedded partnerships and collaborations between the reading/literacy specialist and the teachers or staff working with students on literacy growth.
Develop a professional development plan for your clinical field experience site. Select three topics based on the teacher interviews in Topic 3 and your classroom observations to include in your professional development plan.
The professional development plan will outline how you will address each of the three selected topics throughout the school year. Include appropriate professional development strategies aligned with the needs of the adult learners at your field experience site.
In 500-750 words, include the following in your overall plan:
- Learning objectives for each professional development session.
- Summary of what each session will include.
- Engagement strategies for individual and group learning.
- Calendar that includes dates and short descriptions for each PD session.
- Graphics, templates, or other relevant examples pertaining to the topics.
- Justification why each topic was selected and how the topic will foster a positive , literacy-rich learning environment.
- How you will support collaboration among teachers and maintain positive dispositions throughout the professional development process.
Look at REA 560 Stephen Moore
REA 560 Topic 4 Week 4 Professional Development Plan Samples for Reference
1. https://prezi.com/p/7oopva5mxvvx/professional-development-plan-rea-560/
2.
Course Code
REA-560
Class Code
REA-560-O500
Criteria
Criteria
Percentage
100.0%
Learning Objectives and Summary
10.0%
Engagement Strategies
15.0%
Calendar
10.0%
Graphics, Templates, Relevant Examples
10.0%
Justification
15.0%
Collaboration and Positive Dispositions
20.0%
Research
5.0%
Organization
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Comprehensive Professional Development Plan
No Submission (0.00%)
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Total Points
50.0
Insufficient (69.00%)
Learning objectives included in the professional development
plan are inappropriate and summaries of what each session
includes are unrealistic.
Engagement strategies included are ineffective.
Calendar included is underdeveloped and confusing.
Graphics, templates, or other examples included in the
professional development plan are irrelevant.
Insufficiently justifies why each topic was selected and how
the topic fosters a positive, literacy-rich learning
environment.
The professional development plan provides unrealistic
strategies for supporting collaboration among teachers or
inappropriate ways to maintain positive dispositions
throughout the professional development process.
Sources provided do not support the claims of the
presentation or are not credible. Required number of sources
may not be met.
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the
sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are
compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Approaching (74.00%)
The professional development plan includes weak learning
objectives and a vague summary of each session.
Engagement strategies included do not demonstrate best
practices.
Calendar includes dates and descriptions for each PD session
but is lacking detail.
Graphics, templates, or other examples included in the
professional development plan lack precision.
Minimally justifies why each topic was selected and how the
topic fosters a positive, literacy-rich learning environment.
The professional development plan provides weak strategies
for supporting collaboration among teachers and vague ways
to maintain positive dispositions throughout the professional
development process.
Submission includes only 1-2 sources, sources do not fully
support claims, or sources are not all credible.
The content is not well organized even though it provides the
audience with a sense of the main idea.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although several minor formatting errors are present.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Acceptable (87.00%)
The professional development plan correctly includes clear
learning objectives and a detailed summary of each session.
Effective engagement strategies for individual and group
learning are provided.
A logically organized calendar that includes dates and clear,
concise descriptions for each PD session is provided.
The professional development plan includes relevant
graphics, templates, or other pertinent examples.
Competently justifies why each topic was selected and how
the topic fosters a positive, literacy-rich learning
environment.
The professional development plan provides relevant
strategies for supporting collaboration among teachers and
logical ways to maintain positive dispositions throughout the
professional development process.
Research is relevant and generally supports the information
presented. All of the criteria stated in the assignment are
addressed.
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate
to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear
sense of the main idea.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not
hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence
structures are used, as well as some practice and contentrelated language.
Target (100.00%)
The professional development plan skillfully and
comprehensively includes clear, evidence-based objectives
and a creative summary of each session.
Provides quality engagement strategies for individual and
group learning.
A skillfully crafted calendar that includes dates and
substantial descriptions for each PD session is provided.
The professional development plan includes innovative
graphics, templates, or other pertinent examples.
Convincingly justifies why each topic was selected and how
the topic fosters a positive, literacy-rich learning
environment.
The professional development plan provides effective
strategies for supporting collaboration among teachers and
purposeful ways to maintain positive dispositions throughout
the professional development process.
Comments
Research is supportive of the information presentd. Sources
are timely, distinctive and clearly address all of the criteria
stated in the assignment.
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a
sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The
content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the
audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice
reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related
language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
REA 560 Topic 4 Week 4 Professional Development Plan Samples for Reference
1. https://prezi.com/p/7oopva5mxvvx/professional-development-plan-rea-560/
2.
Course Code
REA-560
Class Code
REA-560-O500
Criteria
Criteria
Percentage
100.0%
Learning Objectives and Summary
10.0%
Engagement Strategies
15.0%
Calendar
10.0%
Graphics, Templates, Relevant Examples
10.0%
Justification
15.0%
Collaboration and Positive Dispositions
20.0%
Research
5.0%
Organization
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Comprehensive Professional Development Plan
No Submission (0.00%)
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Total Points
50.0
Insufficient (69.00%)
Learning objectives included in the professional development
plan are inappropriate and summaries of what each session
includes are unrealistic.
Engagement strategies included are ineffective.
Calendar included is underdeveloped and confusing.
Graphics, templates, or other examples included in the
professional development plan are irrelevant.
Insufficiently justifies why each topic was selected and how
the topic fosters a positive, literacy-rich learning
environment.
The professional development plan provides unrealistic
strategies for supporting collaboration among teachers or
inappropriate ways to maintain positive dispositions
throughout the professional development process.
Sources provided do not support the claims of the
presentation or are not credible. Required number of sources
may not be met.
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the
sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are
compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Approaching (74.00%)
The professional development plan includes weak learning
objectives and a vague summary of each session.
Engagement strategies included do not demonstrate best
practices.
Calendar includes dates and descriptions for each PD session
but is lacking detail.
Graphics, templates, or other examples included in the
professional development plan lack precision.
Minimally justifies why each topic was selected and how the
topic fosters a positive, literacy-rich learning environment.
The professional development plan provides weak strategies
for supporting collaboration among teachers and vague ways
to maintain positive dispositions throughout the professional
development process.
Submission includes only 1-2 sources, sources do not fully
support claims, or sources are not all credible.
The content is not well organized even though it provides the
audience with a sense of the main idea.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although several minor formatting errors are present.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Acceptable (87.00%)
The professional development plan correctly includes clear
learning objectives and a detailed summary of each session.
Effective engagement strategies for individual and group
learning are provided.
A logically organized calendar that includes dates and clear,
concise descriptions for each PD session is provided.
The professional development plan includes relevant
graphics, templates, or other pertinent examples.
Competently justifies why each topic was selected and how
the topic fosters a positive, literacy-rich learning
environment.
The professional development plan provides relevant
strategies for supporting collaboration among teachers and
logical ways to maintain positive dispositions throughout the
professional development process.
Research is relevant and generally supports the information
presented. All of the criteria stated in the assignment are
addressed.
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate
to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear
sense of the main idea.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not
hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence
structures are used, as well as some practice and contentrelated language.
Target (100.00%)
The professional development plan skillfully and
comprehensively includes clear, evidence-based objectives
and a creative summary of each session.
Provides quality engagement strategies for individual and
group learning.
A skillfully crafted calendar that includes dates and
substantial descriptions for each PD session is provided.
The professional development plan includes innovative
graphics, templates, or other pertinent examples.
Convincingly justifies why each topic was selected and how
the topic fosters a positive, literacy-rich learning
environment.
The professional development plan provides effective
strategies for supporting collaboration among teachers and
purposeful ways to maintain positive dispositions throughout
the professional development process.
Comments
Research is supportive of the information presentd. Sources
are timely, distinctive and clearly address all of the criteria
stated in the assignment.
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a
sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The
content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the
audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice
reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related
language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Categories: