Description
Write a paper (1,750-2,000 words) in which you do the following:
- Describe the ethical conflict in the scenario above.
- Describe the options for resolving the ethical conflict including the interpersonal perceptions and other considerations that influence the options. (Benchmarks: Relationships, Spirit and Self-Discovery C8.2: Evaluate changes in one’s ability to be perceptive of others.)
- Identify the preferred option for resolving the conflict, and explain why it is the best option. How does this option address the needs, potential, and motivations of the involved parties? (Benchmarks: Relationships, Spirit and Self-Discovery C8.3: Synthesize the potential and motivations of self and others.)
- Propose steps Research Psychologist A should take to avoid a similar situation in the future.
Details: (For Study Pool)
Research Psychologist A has been conducting a study with human subjects for nearly a year. As a result,
A has come to know Participant M quite well. The study is taking longer than expected, and some of
the participants are leaving the study. Because of the nature of the working relationship with the
participants, Research Psychologist A and Participant M have become interested in an intimate
relationship. Since neither one wants to jeopardize the progress of the study, they agree to retain only
a professional relationship for the duration of the study, and then to pursue an intimate relationship
once the study is completed and the results have been published.
General Requirements: (Please read these requirements and the Rubrics enclosed below)
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Review the 2010 APA Ethics Code. (http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx#)
Refer to Pope, K. S. (n.d.). Dual relationships, multiple relationships, & boundary decisions in
the course materials for this topic. (https://kspope.com/site/multiple-relationships.php)
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to
become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. (See Rubrics below)
In addition to those listed in the assignment directions, this assignment benchmarks the
following writing competencies: C7.1: Produce scholarly academic writing and C7.2:
Demonstrate written logic, argument, and persuasiveness.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style
Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student
Success Center.
Directions:
Write a paper (1,750-2,000 words) in which you do the following:
1. Describe the ethical conflict in the scenario above.
2. Describe the options for resolving the ethical conflict including the interpersonal perceptions
and other considerations that influence the options. (Benchmarks: Relationships, Spirit and
Self-Discovery C8.2: Evaluate changes in one’s ability to be perceptive of others.)
3. Identify the preferred option for resolving the conflict, and explain why it is the best option.
How does this option address the needs, potential, and motivations of the involved parties?
(Benchmarks: Relationships, Spirit and Self-Discovery C8.3: Synthesize the potential and
motivations of self and others.)
4. Propose steps Research Psychologist A should take to avoid a similar situation in the future.
Rubrics:
(Study Pool tutor, please read this rubrics and follow it)
A description of the ethical conflict is thoroughly presented with rich detail.
A description of options for resolving the ethical conflict is thoroughly presented with rich detail.
An identification of and rationale for the preferred resolution option are thoroughly presented with rich detail and
substantial support.
Proposed steps to avoid similar situations are thoroughly presented with rich detail and substantial support.
Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing, presenting a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
The document is correctly formatted. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The
documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Research Psychologist A has been conducting a study with human subjects for nearly a year. As a result,
A has come to know Participant M quite well. The study is taking longer than expected, and some of
the participants are leaving the study. Because of the nature of the working relationship with the
participants, Research Psychologist A and Participant M have become interested in an intimate
relationship. Since neither one wants to jeopardize the progress of the study, they agree to retain only
a professional relationship for the duration of the study, and then to pursue an intimate relationship
once the study is completed and the results have been published.
General Requirements: (Please read these requirements and the Rubrics enclosed below)
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Review the 2010 APA Ethics Code. (http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx#)
Refer to Pope, K. S. (n.d.). Dual relationships, multiple relationships, & boundary decisions in
the course materials for this topic. (https://kspope.com/site/multiple-relationships.php)
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to
become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. (See Rubrics below)
In addition to those listed in the assignment directions, this assignment benchmarks the
following writing competencies: C7.1: Produce scholarly academic writing and C7.2:
Demonstrate written logic, argument, and persuasiveness.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style
Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student
Success Center.
Directions:
Write a paper (1,750-2,000 words) in which you do the following:
1. Describe the ethical conflict in the scenario above.
2. Describe the options for resolving the ethical conflict including the interpersonal perceptions
and other considerations that influence the options. (Benchmarks: Relationships, Spirit and
Self-Discovery C8.2: Evaluate changes in one’s ability to be perceptive of others.)
3. Identify the preferred option for resolving the conflict, and explain why it is the best option.
How does this option address the needs, potential, and motivations of the involved parties?
(Benchmarks: Relationships, Spirit and Self-Discovery C8.3: Synthesize the potential and
motivations of self and others.)
4. Propose steps Research Psychologist A should take to avoid a similar situation in the future.
Rubrics:
(Study Pool tutor, please read this rubrics and follow it)
A description of the ethical conflict is thoroughly presented with rich detail.
A description of options for resolving the ethical conflict is thoroughly presented with rich detail.
An identification of and rationale for the preferred resolution option are thoroughly presented with rich detail and
substantial support.
Proposed steps to avoid similar situations are thoroughly presented with rich detail and substantial support.
Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing, presenting a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
The document is correctly formatted. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The
documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Categories: