Description
Case Report – Translational Research and Evidence-Based Practice
In this assignment, learners are required to write a case report addressing the personal knowledge and skills gained in the current course and potentially solving an identified practice problem.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
- Use at least two additional scholarly research sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used.
- Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
- This assignment uses a rubric. Please Review the rubric prior to the beginning to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
For a specific focus of patient practice (e.g., acute care hospital, clinic, primary care, long-term care, home health), select a particular disease process. Chose a topic of concern such as providing elements of care for a specific disease process or an administrative problem. This topic must be in need of progression or process improvement. Once identified, summarize the literature supporting proposed change. Identify an action plan to introduce change and potential barriers to implementing change. Finally, describe how you would propose evaluating the change.
Your case report must include the following:
- Introduction with a problem statement.
- Brief synthesized review.
- Description of the case/situation/conditions.
- Proposed solutions describing the validity and reliability of the research you have read.
- Conclusion.
Course Code
DNP-820
Class Code
DNP-820-IO5160
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Identification of Topic of Concern
15.0%
Discussion of the progressions or process of
improvement
15.0%
Introduction and Problem Statement
5.0%
Brief Literature Review
5.0%
Description of the Case, Situation, or Conditions 5.0%
Detailed Explanation of the Synthesized
Literature Findings
5.0%
Case Summary
5.0%
Proposed Solutions to Remedy Identified
Technology Gaps, Inefficiencies, or Other Issues
10.0%
Conclusion
5.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Research Citations (In-text citations for
paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference
page listing and formatting, as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Case Report – Translational Research and Evidence-Based Practice
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Identification and description of topic of concern are not
present.
Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is
not present.
An introduction with problem statement is not present.
A brief literature review is not present.
A description of the case, situation, or conditions is not
present.
A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is
not present.
A case summary is not present.
Proposed solutions are not presented.
A conclusion is not presented.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice
and/or sentence construction are used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Total Points
104.0
Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)
Identification and description of topic of concern are present
but incomplete.
Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is
present but incomplete.
An introduction with problem statement is present but
incomplete.
A brief literature review is present but incomplete.
A description of the case, situation, or conditions is present
but incomplete.
A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is
present but incomplete.
A case summary is present but incomplete.
Proposed solutions are presented but are incomplete.
A conclusion is presented but is incomplete.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
Identification and description of topic of concern are present
but done at a perfunctory level.
Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is
present but done at a perfunctory level.
An introduction with problem statement is present but
rendered at a perfunctory level.
A brief literature review is present but rendered at a
perfunctory level.
A description of the case, situation, or conditions is present
but rendered at a perfunctory level.
A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is
present but rendered at a perfunctory level.
A case summary is present but rendered at a perfunctory
level.
Proposed solutions are presented but are rendered at a
perfunctory level.
A conclusion is presented but is rendered at a perfunctory
level.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the
paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although
some errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
Identification and description of topic of concern are clearly
presented and in full. Discussion is convincing. Information
presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is
clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific
elements. Information presented is from scholarly though
dated sources.
An introduction with problem statement is present, clear, and
thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific
elements. Information presented is from scholarly though
dated sources.
A brief literature review is clearly present in full. Information
presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A description of the case, situation, or conditions is
convincing and defines specific elements. Information
presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is
convincing and defines specific elements. Information
presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A case summary is convincing and defines specific elements.
Information presented is from scholarly though dated
sources.
Proposed solutions are clearly presented and thorough.
Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements.
Information presented is from scholarly though dated
sources.
A conclusion is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is
convincing and defines specific elements. Information
presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident.
There is a smooth
progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most
sources are authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is
usually correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Identification and description of topic of concern are clearly
presented and in full. Discussion is insightful and forwardthinking. Information presented is from current scholarly
sources.
Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is
clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific
elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking.
Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
An introduction with problem statement is clearly present.
Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements.
Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information
presented is from current scholarly sources.
A brief literature review is clearly present in full. Discussion is
convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is
insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is
from current scholarly sources.
A description of the case, situation, or conditions is clearly
present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific
elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking.
Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is
clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific
elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking.
Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Comments
A case summary is clearly present. Discussion is convincing
and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and
forward-thinking. Information presented is from current
scholarly sources.
Proposed solutions are clearly presented and thorough.
Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed.
Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
A conclusion is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is
insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information
presented is from current scholarly sources.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and
correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
DNP-820
Class Code
DNP-820-IO5160
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Identification of Topic of Concern
15.0%
Discussion of the progressions or process of
improvement
15.0%
Introduction and Problem Statement
5.0%
Brief Literature Review
5.0%
Description of the Case, Situation, or Conditions 5.0%
Detailed Explanation of the Synthesized
Literature Findings
5.0%
Case Summary
5.0%
Proposed Solutions to Remedy Identified
Technology Gaps, Inefficiencies, or Other Issues
10.0%
Conclusion
5.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Research Citations (In-text citations for
paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference
page listing and formatting, as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Case Report – Translational Research and Evidence-Based Practice
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Identification and description of topic of concern are not
present.
Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is
not present.
An introduction with problem statement is not present.
A brief literature review is not present.
A description of the case, situation, or conditions is not
present.
A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is
not present.
A case summary is not present.
Proposed solutions are not presented.
A conclusion is not presented.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice
and/or sentence construction are used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Total Points
104.0
Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)
Identification and description of topic of concern are present
but incomplete.
Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is
present but incomplete.
An introduction with problem statement is present but
incomplete.
A brief literature review is present but incomplete.
A description of the case, situation, or conditions is present
but incomplete.
A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is
present but incomplete.
A case summary is present but incomplete.
Proposed solutions are presented but are incomplete.
A conclusion is presented but is incomplete.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
Identification and description of topic of concern are present
but done at a perfunctory level.
Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is
present but done at a perfunctory level.
An introduction with problem statement is present but
rendered at a perfunctory level.
A brief literature review is present but rendered at a
perfunctory level.
A description of the case, situation, or conditions is present
but rendered at a perfunctory level.
A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is
present but rendered at a perfunctory level.
A case summary is present but rendered at a perfunctory
level.
Proposed solutions are presented but are rendered at a
perfunctory level.
A conclusion is presented but is rendered at a perfunctory
level.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the
paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although
some errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
Identification and description of topic of concern are clearly
presented and in full. Discussion is convincing. Information
presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is
clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific
elements. Information presented is from scholarly though
dated sources.
An introduction with problem statement is present, clear, and
thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific
elements. Information presented is from scholarly though
dated sources.
A brief literature review is clearly present in full. Information
presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A description of the case, situation, or conditions is
convincing and defines specific elements. Information
presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is
convincing and defines specific elements. Information
presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A case summary is convincing and defines specific elements.
Information presented is from scholarly though dated
sources.
Proposed solutions are clearly presented and thorough.
Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements.
Information presented is from scholarly though dated
sources.
A conclusion is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is
convincing and defines specific elements. Information
presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident.
There is a smooth
progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most
sources are authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is
usually correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Identification and description of topic of concern are clearly
presented and in full. Discussion is insightful and forwardthinking. Information presented is from current scholarly
sources.
Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is
clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific
elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking.
Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
An introduction with problem statement is clearly present.
Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements.
Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information
presented is from current scholarly sources.
A brief literature review is clearly present in full. Discussion is
convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is
insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is
from current scholarly sources.
A description of the case, situation, or conditions is clearly
present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific
elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking.
Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is
clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific
elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking.
Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Comments
A case summary is clearly present. Discussion is convincing
and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and
forward-thinking. Information presented is from current
scholarly sources.
Proposed solutions are clearly presented and thorough.
Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed.
Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
A conclusion is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is
insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information
presented is from current scholarly sources.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and
correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Categories: