Description
In a “perfect world” capital market, how important is a firm’s decision to pay dividends versus repurchase shares? Under what conditions would you have a tax preference for share repurchase rather than dividends? Would managers acting in the interests of long-term shareholders be more likely to repurchase shares if they believed the stock to be either undervalued or overvalued?
See attached. Respond to the attached Discussion post.
Initial Discussion question:
In a “perfect world” capital market, how important is a firm’s decision to pay dividends versus
repurchase shares? Under what conditions would you have a tax preference for share repurchase rather
than dividends? Would managers acting in the interests of long-term shareholders be more likely to
repurchase shares if they believed the stock to be either undervalued or overvalued?
My reply:
A firm’s decision to pay dividends rather than repurchase shares is influenced, to a larger extent, by the
obvious benefit of income. A dividend payment is a direct influx of cash in the investors’ pockets, which
is beneficial for expenses of shareholders. Further, firms benefit with a dividend reinvestment plan,
where shareholders use the distributed profits to purchase more shares. Moreover, a firm’s decision can
be influenced by the certain gain in dividend payment. For instance, if a payment of $1 in dividend is
paid, shareholders receive the exact amount. On the other hand, if a company decides to repurchase
shares and there is an unfortunate fall by 50%, there is an accompanying affective drop in distribution to
$0.50.
A share repurchase, as illustrated in Brown, & O’Day, (2005), is a tax efficient alternative to return
capital to shareholders, considering the accompanying lack of tac on buybacks, even with a rise in prorata equity, and the impact is more profit and cash dividends on repurchases, even without an increase
in sales or profits. Repurchases are favorable from a tax perspective, since the entire amount of profit is
reinvested for the benefit of the shareholder. Yes, a manager acting in the interest of share-holders will
repurchase shares in case of overvaluation or undervaluation. One of the accompanying implications of
a repurchase is the share price is driven higher overtime, and according to Brown, & O’Day, (2005), the
implication is capital gains for the shareholders. However, consideration should be made for profits
made, which are taxable when the shareholder sells the shares, crystallizing the gains.
References
Brown, C., & O’Day, J. (2005). The Relationship between share repurchases and dividends in an
imputation tax environment. workingpaper (The University ofMelhourne).
Classmate response:
Please reply to this response:
Hi Brad, nice work summarizing the differences between repurchasing stock and issuing dividends. For
many people, the option to have immediate access to funds is worth the 15% tax rate (or somewhere
around there). The downsides of repurchasing shares are apparent, especially because of the inherent
risk with associated with essentially reinvesting in the company that is exposed to an open market.
Obviously in a perfect market situation, this changes dramatically. Do you think the tax advantages and
benefits outweigh the risk in a non-perfect market? Or are there other factors that should be strongly
considered? Thanks!
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
In a “perfect world” capital market, how important is a firm’s decision to pay dividends versus
repurchase shares? Under what conditions would you have a tax preference for share repurchase rather
than dividends? Would managers acting in the interests of long-term shareholders be more likely to
repurchase shares if they believed the stock to be either undervalued or overvalued?
My reply:
A firm’s decision to pay dividends rather than repurchase shares is influenced, to a larger extent, by the
obvious benefit of income. A dividend payment is a direct influx of cash in the investors’ pockets, which
is beneficial for expenses of shareholders. Further, firms benefit with a dividend reinvestment plan,
where shareholders use the distributed profits to purchase more shares. Moreover, a firm’s decision can
be influenced by the certain gain in dividend payment. For instance, if a payment of $1 in dividend is
paid, shareholders receive the exact amount. On the other hand, if a company decides to repurchase
shares and there is an unfortunate fall by 50%, there is an accompanying affective drop in distribution to
$0.50.
A share repurchase, as illustrated in Brown, & O’Day, (2005), is a tax efficient alternative to return
capital to shareholders, considering the accompanying lack of tac on buybacks, even with a rise in prorata equity, and the impact is more profit and cash dividends on repurchases, even without an increase
in sales or profits. Repurchases are favorable from a tax perspective, since the entire amount of profit is
reinvested for the benefit of the shareholder. Yes, a manager acting in the interest of share-holders will
repurchase shares in case of overvaluation or undervaluation. One of the accompanying implications of
a repurchase is the share price is driven higher overtime, and according to Brown, & O’Day, (2005), the
implication is capital gains for the shareholders. However, consideration should be made for profits
made, which are taxable when the shareholder sells the shares, crystallizing the gains.
References
Brown, C., & O’Day, J. (2005). The Relationship between share repurchases and dividends in an
imputation tax environment. workingpaper (The University ofMelhourne).
Classmate response:
Please reply to this response:
Hi Brad, nice work summarizing the differences between repurchasing stock and issuing dividends. For
many people, the option to have immediate access to funds is worth the 15% tax rate (or somewhere
around there). The downsides of repurchasing shares are apparent, especially because of the inherent
risk with associated with essentially reinvesting in the company that is exposed to an open market.
Obviously in a perfect market situation, this changes dramatically. Do you think the tax advantages and
benefits outweigh the risk in a non-perfect market? Or are there other factors that should be strongly
considered? Thanks!
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Categories: