Description
Submit a synthesis of statistical findings derived from correlational analysis that follows the Week 5 Assignment Template. Your synthesis must include the following:
- A description and justification for using the Pearson Product-Moment correlation test
- A properly formatted research question
- A properly formatted H0(null) and H1 (alternate) hypothesis
- An APA-formatted “Results” section for the Pearson Product-Moment test
- Identification of the statistical test
- Identification of variables (there is no distinction between independent and dependent variables for the Pearson Product-Moment correlation test)
- Identification of data assumptions and assessment outcome
- Inferential results in correct APA statistical notation format
- A properly formatted scatter plot
- An explanation of the differences and similarities of correlation analysis and bivariate regression analysis
- Properly APA-formatted references
- An Appendix containing SPSS output
Research Question
Is there a statistically significant relationship between normative commitment, affective commitment, continuous commitment and job satisfaction?
Hypotheses
H0: There is not a statistically significant relationship between normative commitment, affective commitment, continuous commitment, and job satisfaction.
H1: There is a statistically significant relationship between normative commitment, affective commitment, continuous commitment, and job satisfaction.
Please only use bootstrapping if you find a violation of the assumptions.
Support your decision to use (or not use) bootstrapping based on
the evidence.
Assignment: SPSS – Multiple Regression
Multiple linear regression is a logical extension to the Pearson Product-Moment
Correlation test. Researchers use multiple linear regression to examine the
relationship between at least two predictor variables and a scale (numerical)
dependent variable. Multiple linear regression is the most commonly used
statistical test for quantitative DBA studies.
For this Assignment, you will run a multiple linear regression using the Week 6
Data File for Multiple Linear Regression. You will use “job satisfaction” as the
dependent variable.
To prepare for this Assignment, review Lesson 16A and Lessons 31–35 in your
Green and Salkind (2017) text, the Week 6 Assignment Exemplar and Week 6
Assignment Template documents, as well as the tutorial videos provided in this
week’s Resources. Consider how a multiple regression analysis will allow you to
answer your research questions effectively.
By Day 7
•
•
o
o
o
o
o
Submit a synthesis of statistical findings derived from multiple regression analysis
that follows the Week 6 Assignment Template. Your synthesis must include the
following:
An APA Results section for the multiple regression test [see an example in Lesson
34 of the Green and Salkind (2017) text].
Only the critical elements of your SPSS output:
A properly formatted research question
A properly formatted H10 (null) and H1a (alternate) hypothesis
A descriptive statistics narrative and properly formatted descriptive statistics
table
A properly formatted scatterplot graph
A properly formatted inferential APA Results Section to include a properly
formatted Normal Probability Plot (P-P) of the Regression Standardized Residual
and the scatterplot of the standardized residuals
o
•
An Appendix including the SPSS output generated for descriptive and inferential
statistics
An explanation of the differences and similarities of bivariate regression analysis
and multiple regression analyses
Note: You will cut and paste the appropriate SPSS output into the Appendix. The
SPSS output is not in APA format, so you will need to type the information from
the SPSS output to the appropriate sections of the APA table. You must use the
Week 6 Assignment Template to complete this Assignment. Also, refer to the Week
6 Assignment Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor
will use this rubric to assess your work.
1
DDBA 8307 Week 6 Assignment Template – Multiple Regression
John Doe
DDBA 8307-6
Dr. Jane Doe
2
Multiple Linear Regression
Type text here. Describe and defend using the multiple linear regression test for
your analysis. Use at least two outside resources—that is, resources not provided in the
course resources, readings, etc. These citations will be presented in the References
section. This exercise will give you practice for addressing Rubric Item 2.13b, which
states, “Describes and defends, in detail, the statistical analyses that the student will
conduct….” This section should be no more than two paragraphs.
Research Question
Type research question here.
Hypotheses
H0: Type null hypothesis here.
H1: Type alternative hypothesis here.
Results
In this subheading, I will present descriptive statistics, discuss testing of the
assumptions, present inferential statistic results, and conclude with a concise summary.
Descriptive Statistics
Present appropriate descriptive statistics here.
Tests of Assumptions
Type text here.
Inferential Results
Present appropriate inferential results here.
3
4
References
Type references here in proper APA format.
5
Appendix – Multiple Linear Regression SPSS Output
Superior Criteria
Excellent Criteria
Satisfactory Criteria
Marginal Criteria
Unsatisfactory Criteria
Not Submitted
Element 1: Multiple Regression Test
5.6 (7%)
5.32 (6.65%)
Student presents in his/her APA Results
Section the multiple regression test. There
are one or two minor errors.
4.76 (5.95%)
Student presents in his/her APA Results
Section the multiple regression test;
however, there are some errors.
Student presents in his/her APA Results
Section the multiple regression test. There
are no errors.
4.2 (5.25%)
Student presents in his/her APA Results
Section the multiple regression test;
however there are numerous errors.
2.8 (3.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
Element 2: Research Question
5.6 (7%)
0 (0%)
2.8 (3.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
Did not submit element.
Student creates a properly written
quantitative research question (10-15
words) that includes the
independent/predictor and
dependent/criterion variables. There are
no errors.
5.32 (6.65%)
Student creates a properly written
quantitative research question (10-15
words) that includes the
independent/predictor and
dependent/criterion variables. There are
one or two minor errors.
4.76 (5.95%)
Student creates a quantitative research
question (10-15 words) that includes the
independent/predictor and
dependent/criterion variables; however
there are issues that need to be addressed
(i.e., with the clarity of the quantitative
research question and/or the variables).
4.2 (5.25%)
Student creates a research question;
however it is either not a quantitative
research question, does not include the
variables, and/or there are other
significant issues identified that make the
research question inappropriate for a
quantitative study.
Element 3: Hypotheses
2.8 (3.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
5.6 (7%)
Student creates a properly written null
hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis
using correct APA format. There are no
errors.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
5.32 (6.65%)
Student creates a properly written null
hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis
using correct APA format. There are one or
two minor errors.
4.2 (5.25%)
Student only submits one hypothesis for
the research question.
4.76 (5.95%)
Student creates a null hypothesis and an
alternative hypothesis; however, there are
some issues with the format or whether
the hypotheses support the research
question.
Element 4: Descriptive Statistics Narrative &
Table
0 (0%)
2.8 (3.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
Did not submit element.
5.6 (7%)
Student presents a thorough and detailed
descriptive statistics narrative and properly
formatted descriptive statistics table.
There are no errors.
5.32 (6.65%)
Student presents a detailed descriptive
statistics narrative and properly formatted
descriptive statistics table. There are one
or two minor errors.
4.76 (5.95%)
Student presents a descriptive statistics
narrative and a descriptive statistics table;
however, there are some missing details
and/or incorrect formatting of the
descriptive statistics table.
4.2 (5.25%)
Student presents a cursory or incomplete
descriptive statistics narrative and/or
cursory or incomplete a descriptive
statistics table.
Element 5: Graphs
2.8 (3.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
5.6 (7%)
Student presents a properly formatted
scatterplot graph and a properly formatted
inferential APA Results Section to include a
properly formatted Normal Probability Plot
(P-P) of the Regression Standardized
Residual and the scatterplot of the
standardized results. There are no errors.
5.32 (6.65%)
Student presents a properly formatted
scatterplot graph and a properly formatted
inferential APA Results Section to include a
properly formatted Normal Probability Plot
(P-P) of the Regression Standardized
Residual and the scatterplot of the
standardized results. There are one or two
minor errors.
4.76 (5.95%)
Student presents a scatterplot graph and
an inferential APA Results Section to
include a Normal Probability Plot (P-P) of
the Regression Standardized Residual and
the scatterplot of the standardized results.
There are some errors on one or more of
the graphs.
4.2 (5.25%)
Student presents an incorrect scatterplot
graph and/or an incorrect inferential APA
Results Section to include a Normal
Probability Plot (P-P) of the Regression
Standardized Residual and/or an incorrect
scatterplot of the standardized results.
There are errors on all graphs and/or
graphs are not properly formatted.
Element 6: Appendix
6.4 (8%)
3.2 (4%)
0 (0%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
Did not submit element.
Student presents an Appendix with
accurate SPSS output generated for
descriptive and inferential statistics. There
are no errors.
6.08 (7.6%)
Student presents an Appendix with
accurate SPSS output generated for
descriptive and inferential statistics. There
are one or two minor errors.
5.44 (6.8%)
Student presents an Appendix with SPSS
output generated for descriptive and
inferential statistics; however, there are
some errors.
4.8 (6%)
Student presents a cursory or incomplete
Appendix with SPSS output generated for
descriptive and inferential statistics. There
are numerous errors and/or missing SPSS
output data.
0 (0%)
Element 7: Differences and similarities
Between Bivariate Regression Analysis and
Multiple Regression Analyses
2.8 (3.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
Did not submit element.
5.6 (7%)
Student presents a thorough and detailed
explanation of the differences and
similarities of bivariate regression analysis
and multiple regression analyses. Several
sources and examples support thinking.
5.32 (6.65%)
Student presents a detailed explanation of
the differences and similarities of bivariate
regression analysis and multiple regression
analyses. Several sources and examples
support thinking. There are one or two
minor errors in explanation.
4.76 (5.95%)
Student presents an explanation with
some details of the differences and
similarities of bivariate regression analysis
and multiple regression analyses. Some
sources and examples support thinking.
4.2 (5.25%)
Student presents a cursory or incomplete
explanation with vague or missing details
of the differences and similarities of
bivariate regression analysis and multiple
regression analyses. Few sources or
examples support thinking.
Element 8: Critical Thinking
8 (10%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
16 (20%)
Writing exhibits strong evidence of
thoughtful critical analysis and thinking;
careful examination is made of
assumptions and possible biases, with
detailed supporting rationale. Writing
synthesizes the classroom experiences and
content; analyze patterns or connections
between theory and practice; and draws
logical conclusions based on well-
reasoned, superb arguments.
15.2 (19%)
Writing exhibits evidence of thoughtful
critical analysis and thinking, careful
examination is made of assumptions and
possible biases, with detailed supporting
rationale. Writing synthesizes the
classroom experiences and content;
analyze patterns or connections between
theory and practice; and draws logical
conclusions based on well-reasoned,
superb arguments. There are one or two
minor errors in explanation.
13.6 (17%)
Writing exhibits some evidence of
thoughtful critical analysis and thinking. A
good examination is made of assumptions
and possible biases, with some supporting
rationale. Writing synthesizes the
classroom experiences and content;
analyzes patterns or connections between
theory and practice; and draws logical
conclusions based on well-reasoned
arguments adequately, but not superbly.
12 (15%)
Writing exhibits little evidence of
thoughtful critical analysis and thinking.
Examination is not made of assumptions
and possible biases. Writing does not
synthesize the classroom experiences and
content; nor analyzes patterns or
connections between theory and practice.
Logical conclusions based on well-
reasoned arguments are not exhibited.
Element 9: Written Delivery Style & Grammar
6 (7.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
12 (15%)
Student consistently follows APA writing
style and basic rules of formal English
grammar and written essay style. Student
communicates in a cohesive, logical style.
There are no spelling or grammar errors.
11.4 (14.25%)
Student consistently follows APA writing
style and basic rules of formal English
grammar and written essay style. Student
communicates in a cohesive, logical style.
There are one or two minor errors in
spelling or grammar.
10.2 (12.75%)
Student mostly follows APA writing style
and basic rules of formal English grammar
and written essay style. Student mostly
communicates in a cohesive, logical style.
There are some errors in spelling or
grammar.
9 (11.25%)
Student does not follow APA writing style
and basic rules of formal English grammar
and written essay style and does not
communicate in a cohesive, logical style.
Element 10: Formal and Appropriate
Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of
Ideas (APA Citations)
6 (7.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
12 (15%)
Student demonstrates full adherence to
scholarly reference requirements and
adheres to APA style with respect to source
attribution, references, heading and
subheading logic, table of contents and
lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.
11.4 (14.25%)
Student demonstrates full adherence to
scholarly reference requirements and
adheres to APA style with respect to source
attribution, references, heading and
subheading logic, table of contents and
lists of charts, etc. There are one or two
minor errors in APA style or format.
10.2 (12.75%)
Student mostly adheres to scholarly
reference requirements and/or mostly
adheres to APA style with respect to source
attribution, references, heading and
subheading logic, table of contents and
lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA
format and style are evident.
9 (11.25%)
Student demonstrates weak or
inconsistent adherence scholarly reference
requirements and/or weak or inconsistent
adherence to APA style with respect to
source attribution, references, heading and
subheading logic, table of contents and
lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA
format and style are evident.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Support your decision to use (or not use) bootstrapping based on
the evidence.
Assignment: SPSS – Multiple Regression
Multiple linear regression is a logical extension to the Pearson Product-Moment
Correlation test. Researchers use multiple linear regression to examine the
relationship between at least two predictor variables and a scale (numerical)
dependent variable. Multiple linear regression is the most commonly used
statistical test for quantitative DBA studies.
For this Assignment, you will run a multiple linear regression using the Week 6
Data File for Multiple Linear Regression. You will use “job satisfaction” as the
dependent variable.
To prepare for this Assignment, review Lesson 16A and Lessons 31–35 in your
Green and Salkind (2017) text, the Week 6 Assignment Exemplar and Week 6
Assignment Template documents, as well as the tutorial videos provided in this
week’s Resources. Consider how a multiple regression analysis will allow you to
answer your research questions effectively.
By Day 7
•
•
o
o
o
o
o
Submit a synthesis of statistical findings derived from multiple regression analysis
that follows the Week 6 Assignment Template. Your synthesis must include the
following:
An APA Results section for the multiple regression test [see an example in Lesson
34 of the Green and Salkind (2017) text].
Only the critical elements of your SPSS output:
A properly formatted research question
A properly formatted H10 (null) and H1a (alternate) hypothesis
A descriptive statistics narrative and properly formatted descriptive statistics
table
A properly formatted scatterplot graph
A properly formatted inferential APA Results Section to include a properly
formatted Normal Probability Plot (P-P) of the Regression Standardized Residual
and the scatterplot of the standardized residuals
o
•
An Appendix including the SPSS output generated for descriptive and inferential
statistics
An explanation of the differences and similarities of bivariate regression analysis
and multiple regression analyses
Note: You will cut and paste the appropriate SPSS output into the Appendix. The
SPSS output is not in APA format, so you will need to type the information from
the SPSS output to the appropriate sections of the APA table. You must use the
Week 6 Assignment Template to complete this Assignment. Also, refer to the Week
6 Assignment Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor
will use this rubric to assess your work.
1
DDBA 8307 Week 6 Assignment Template – Multiple Regression
John Doe
DDBA 8307-6
Dr. Jane Doe
2
Multiple Linear Regression
Type text here. Describe and defend using the multiple linear regression test for
your analysis. Use at least two outside resources—that is, resources not provided in the
course resources, readings, etc. These citations will be presented in the References
section. This exercise will give you practice for addressing Rubric Item 2.13b, which
states, “Describes and defends, in detail, the statistical analyses that the student will
conduct….” This section should be no more than two paragraphs.
Research Question
Type research question here.
Hypotheses
H0: Type null hypothesis here.
H1: Type alternative hypothesis here.
Results
In this subheading, I will present descriptive statistics, discuss testing of the
assumptions, present inferential statistic results, and conclude with a concise summary.
Descriptive Statistics
Present appropriate descriptive statistics here.
Tests of Assumptions
Type text here.
Inferential Results
Present appropriate inferential results here.
3
4
References
Type references here in proper APA format.
5
Appendix – Multiple Linear Regression SPSS Output
Superior Criteria
Excellent Criteria
Satisfactory Criteria
Marginal Criteria
Unsatisfactory Criteria
Not Submitted
Element 1: Multiple Regression Test
5.6 (7%)
5.32 (6.65%)
Student presents in his/her APA Results
Section the multiple regression test. There
are one or two minor errors.
4.76 (5.95%)
Student presents in his/her APA Results
Section the multiple regression test;
however, there are some errors.
Student presents in his/her APA Results
Section the multiple regression test. There
are no errors.
4.2 (5.25%)
Student presents in his/her APA Results
Section the multiple regression test;
however there are numerous errors.
2.8 (3.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
Element 2: Research Question
5.6 (7%)
0 (0%)
2.8 (3.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
Did not submit element.
Student creates a properly written
quantitative research question (10-15
words) that includes the
independent/predictor and
dependent/criterion variables. There are
no errors.
5.32 (6.65%)
Student creates a properly written
quantitative research question (10-15
words) that includes the
independent/predictor and
dependent/criterion variables. There are
one or two minor errors.
4.76 (5.95%)
Student creates a quantitative research
question (10-15 words) that includes the
independent/predictor and
dependent/criterion variables; however
there are issues that need to be addressed
(i.e., with the clarity of the quantitative
research question and/or the variables).
4.2 (5.25%)
Student creates a research question;
however it is either not a quantitative
research question, does not include the
variables, and/or there are other
significant issues identified that make the
research question inappropriate for a
quantitative study.
Element 3: Hypotheses
2.8 (3.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
5.6 (7%)
Student creates a properly written null
hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis
using correct APA format. There are no
errors.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
5.32 (6.65%)
Student creates a properly written null
hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis
using correct APA format. There are one or
two minor errors.
4.2 (5.25%)
Student only submits one hypothesis for
the research question.
4.76 (5.95%)
Student creates a null hypothesis and an
alternative hypothesis; however, there are
some issues with the format or whether
the hypotheses support the research
question.
Element 4: Descriptive Statistics Narrative &
Table
0 (0%)
2.8 (3.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
Did not submit element.
5.6 (7%)
Student presents a thorough and detailed
descriptive statistics narrative and properly
formatted descriptive statistics table.
There are no errors.
5.32 (6.65%)
Student presents a detailed descriptive
statistics narrative and properly formatted
descriptive statistics table. There are one
or two minor errors.
4.76 (5.95%)
Student presents a descriptive statistics
narrative and a descriptive statistics table;
however, there are some missing details
and/or incorrect formatting of the
descriptive statistics table.
4.2 (5.25%)
Student presents a cursory or incomplete
descriptive statistics narrative and/or
cursory or incomplete a descriptive
statistics table.
Element 5: Graphs
2.8 (3.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
5.6 (7%)
Student presents a properly formatted
scatterplot graph and a properly formatted
inferential APA Results Section to include a
properly formatted Normal Probability Plot
(P-P) of the Regression Standardized
Residual and the scatterplot of the
standardized results. There are no errors.
5.32 (6.65%)
Student presents a properly formatted
scatterplot graph and a properly formatted
inferential APA Results Section to include a
properly formatted Normal Probability Plot
(P-P) of the Regression Standardized
Residual and the scatterplot of the
standardized results. There are one or two
minor errors.
4.76 (5.95%)
Student presents a scatterplot graph and
an inferential APA Results Section to
include a Normal Probability Plot (P-P) of
the Regression Standardized Residual and
the scatterplot of the standardized results.
There are some errors on one or more of
the graphs.
4.2 (5.25%)
Student presents an incorrect scatterplot
graph and/or an incorrect inferential APA
Results Section to include a Normal
Probability Plot (P-P) of the Regression
Standardized Residual and/or an incorrect
scatterplot of the standardized results.
There are errors on all graphs and/or
graphs are not properly formatted.
Element 6: Appendix
6.4 (8%)
3.2 (4%)
0 (0%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
Did not submit element.
Student presents an Appendix with
accurate SPSS output generated for
descriptive and inferential statistics. There
are no errors.
6.08 (7.6%)
Student presents an Appendix with
accurate SPSS output generated for
descriptive and inferential statistics. There
are one or two minor errors.
5.44 (6.8%)
Student presents an Appendix with SPSS
output generated for descriptive and
inferential statistics; however, there are
some errors.
4.8 (6%)
Student presents a cursory or incomplete
Appendix with SPSS output generated for
descriptive and inferential statistics. There
are numerous errors and/or missing SPSS
output data.
0 (0%)
Element 7: Differences and similarities
Between Bivariate Regression Analysis and
Multiple Regression Analyses
2.8 (3.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
Did not submit element.
5.6 (7%)
Student presents a thorough and detailed
explanation of the differences and
similarities of bivariate regression analysis
and multiple regression analyses. Several
sources and examples support thinking.
5.32 (6.65%)
Student presents a detailed explanation of
the differences and similarities of bivariate
regression analysis and multiple regression
analyses. Several sources and examples
support thinking. There are one or two
minor errors in explanation.
4.76 (5.95%)
Student presents an explanation with
some details of the differences and
similarities of bivariate regression analysis
and multiple regression analyses. Some
sources and examples support thinking.
4.2 (5.25%)
Student presents a cursory or incomplete
explanation with vague or missing details
of the differences and similarities of
bivariate regression analysis and multiple
regression analyses. Few sources or
examples support thinking.
Element 8: Critical Thinking
8 (10%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
16 (20%)
Writing exhibits strong evidence of
thoughtful critical analysis and thinking;
careful examination is made of
assumptions and possible biases, with
detailed supporting rationale. Writing
synthesizes the classroom experiences and
content; analyze patterns or connections
between theory and practice; and draws
logical conclusions based on well-
reasoned, superb arguments.
15.2 (19%)
Writing exhibits evidence of thoughtful
critical analysis and thinking, careful
examination is made of assumptions and
possible biases, with detailed supporting
rationale. Writing synthesizes the
classroom experiences and content;
analyze patterns or connections between
theory and practice; and draws logical
conclusions based on well-reasoned,
superb arguments. There are one or two
minor errors in explanation.
13.6 (17%)
Writing exhibits some evidence of
thoughtful critical analysis and thinking. A
good examination is made of assumptions
and possible biases, with some supporting
rationale. Writing synthesizes the
classroom experiences and content;
analyzes patterns or connections between
theory and practice; and draws logical
conclusions based on well-reasoned
arguments adequately, but not superbly.
12 (15%)
Writing exhibits little evidence of
thoughtful critical analysis and thinking.
Examination is not made of assumptions
and possible biases. Writing does not
synthesize the classroom experiences and
content; nor analyzes patterns or
connections between theory and practice.
Logical conclusions based on well-
reasoned arguments are not exhibited.
Element 9: Written Delivery Style & Grammar
6 (7.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
12 (15%)
Student consistently follows APA writing
style and basic rules of formal English
grammar and written essay style. Student
communicates in a cohesive, logical style.
There are no spelling or grammar errors.
11.4 (14.25%)
Student consistently follows APA writing
style and basic rules of formal English
grammar and written essay style. Student
communicates in a cohesive, logical style.
There are one or two minor errors in
spelling or grammar.
10.2 (12.75%)
Student mostly follows APA writing style
and basic rules of formal English grammar
and written essay style. Student mostly
communicates in a cohesive, logical style.
There are some errors in spelling or
grammar.
9 (11.25%)
Student does not follow APA writing style
and basic rules of formal English grammar
and written essay style and does not
communicate in a cohesive, logical style.
Element 10: Formal and Appropriate
Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of
Ideas (APA Citations)
6 (7.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
12 (15%)
Student demonstrates full adherence to
scholarly reference requirements and
adheres to APA style with respect to source
attribution, references, heading and
subheading logic, table of contents and
lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.
11.4 (14.25%)
Student demonstrates full adherence to
scholarly reference requirements and
adheres to APA style with respect to source
attribution, references, heading and
subheading logic, table of contents and
lists of charts, etc. There are one or two
minor errors in APA style or format.
10.2 (12.75%)
Student mostly adheres to scholarly
reference requirements and/or mostly
adheres to APA style with respect to source
attribution, references, heading and
subheading logic, table of contents and
lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA
format and style are evident.
9 (11.25%)
Student demonstrates weak or
inconsistent adherence scholarly reference
requirements and/or weak or inconsistent
adherence to APA style with respect to
source attribution, references, heading and
subheading logic, table of contents and
lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA
format and style are evident.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Categories: