Description
In a paper 1,000-1,250 words, complete the following:
1. Explain cultural factors that influence the development of ethical relationships in or between cultures.
2. Evaluate the different perspectives on the ethics of developing, maintaining, or ending relationships in members of different cultural groups?
3. Explain how differing cultural values and norms may influence conflict styles.
4. Give specific illustrations that show different conflict styles of people from different cultures.
5. Project must have a minimum of five scholarly sources.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
This assignment assesses the following competencies:
Comp 4.1 Evaluate the connection between ethical communication and different worldviews.
Comp 2.3 Compare and contrast how communicative behaviors reflect various cultural norms.
Course Code
COM-263
Class Code
COM-263-O501
Criteria
Content
Percentage
80.0%
Explain cultural factors that influence the
development of ethical relationships in or
between cultures.
18.0%
Evaluate the different perspectives on the ethics
of developing, maintaining, or ending
relationships in members of different cultural
groups? (Comp 4.1)
18.0%
Explain how differing cultural values and norms
may influence conflict styles.
18.0%
Give specific illustrations that show different
conflict styles of people from different cultures.
(Comp 2.3)
18.0%
Project must have a minimum of 5 scholarly
sources.
8.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
17.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
6.0%
Paragraph Development and Transitions
6.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
3.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
2.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
1.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Benchmark – Intercultural Relationships
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Product does not provide an explanation of cultural factors
that influence the development of ethical relationships in or
between cultures.
Product does not provide an evaluation of the different
perspectives on the ethics of developing, maintaining, or
ending relationships in members of different cultural groups.
Product does not provide an explanation of how differing
cultural values and norms may influence conflict styles.
Product does not give specific illustrations that show different
conflict styles of people from different cultures.
No outside sources are cited.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and
coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are
established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and
scope. Organization is disjointed.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Appropriate template is not used appropriately or
documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
225.0
Less than Satisfactory (65.00%)
Product provides a vague explanation of cultural factors that
influence the development of ethical relationships in or
between cultures.
Product vaguely provides the different perspectives on the
ethics of developing, maintaining, or ending relationships in
members of different cultural groups.
Product vaguely provides an explanation of how differing
cultural values and norms may influence conflict styles.
Product vaguely gives specific illustrations that show different
conflict styles of people from different cultures.
Some sources may be cited but they are not scholarly and/or
relevant.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression
of ideas, unity, coherence, or cohesiveness. Some degree of
organization is evident.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (75.00%)
Product provides an explanation of cultural factors that
influence the development of ethical relationships in or
between cultures.
Product provides the different perspectives on the ethics of
developing, maintaining, or ending relationships in members
of different cultural groups
Product provides an explanation of how differing cultural
values and norms may influence conflict styles.
Product gives specific illustrations that show different conflict
styles of people from different cultures.
At least nine relevant, scholarly sources are cited in a loosely
connected, vague way.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show
some inconsistency in organization or in their relationship to
each other.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct,
although some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (85.00%)
Through research, product provides a clear explanation of
cultural factors that influence the development of ethical
relationships in or between cultures.
Through research, product provides a clear evaluation of the
different perspectives on the ethics of developing,
maintaining, or ending relationships in members of different
cultural groups.
Through research, product provides a clear explanation of
how differing cultural values and norms may influence
conflict styles.
Product gives specific illustrations that show different conflict
styles of people from different cultures.
At least nine relevant, scholarly sources are cited in a wellconnected way and elaborated on.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is
apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and
cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are
appropriate to purpose.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Through current research, product provides a clear and
thorough explanation of cultural factors that influence the
development of ethical relationships in or between cultures.
Through current research, product provides a clear and
thorough evaluation of the different perspectives on the
ethics of developing, maintaining, or ending relationships in
members of different cultural groups.
Through current research, product provides a clear and
thorough explanation of how differing cultural values and
norms may influence conflict styles.
Product clearly gives specific illustrations that show different
conflict styles of people from different cultures.
At least nine relevant, scholarly sources are cited and are
flawlessly integrated into the essay to support the claims
made therein.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Comments
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and
transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other.
Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.
Paragraph structure is seamless.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
COM-263
Class Code
COM-263-O501
Criteria
Content
Percentage
80.0%
Explain cultural factors that influence the
development of ethical relationships in or
between cultures.
18.0%
Evaluate the different perspectives on the ethics
of developing, maintaining, or ending
relationships in members of different cultural
groups? (Comp 4.1)
18.0%
Explain how differing cultural values and norms
may influence conflict styles.
18.0%
Give specific illustrations that show different
conflict styles of people from different cultures.
(Comp 2.3)
18.0%
Project must have a minimum of 5 scholarly
sources.
8.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
17.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
6.0%
Paragraph Development and Transitions
6.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
3.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
2.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
1.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Benchmark – Intercultural Relationships
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Product does not provide an explanation of cultural factors
that influence the development of ethical relationships in or
between cultures.
Product does not provide an evaluation of the different
perspectives on the ethics of developing, maintaining, or
ending relationships in members of different cultural groups.
Product does not provide an explanation of how differing
cultural values and norms may influence conflict styles.
Product does not give specific illustrations that show different
conflict styles of people from different cultures.
No outside sources are cited.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and
coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are
established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and
scope. Organization is disjointed.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Appropriate template is not used appropriately or
documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
225.0
Less than Satisfactory (65.00%)
Product provides a vague explanation of cultural factors that
influence the development of ethical relationships in or
between cultures.
Product vaguely provides the different perspectives on the
ethics of developing, maintaining, or ending relationships in
members of different cultural groups.
Product vaguely provides an explanation of how differing
cultural values and norms may influence conflict styles.
Product vaguely gives specific illustrations that show different
conflict styles of people from different cultures.
Some sources may be cited but they are not scholarly and/or
relevant.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression
of ideas, unity, coherence, or cohesiveness. Some degree of
organization is evident.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (75.00%)
Product provides an explanation of cultural factors that
influence the development of ethical relationships in or
between cultures.
Product provides the different perspectives on the ethics of
developing, maintaining, or ending relationships in members
of different cultural groups
Product provides an explanation of how differing cultural
values and norms may influence conflict styles.
Product gives specific illustrations that show different conflict
styles of people from different cultures.
At least nine relevant, scholarly sources are cited in a loosely
connected, vague way.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show
some inconsistency in organization or in their relationship to
each other.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct,
although some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (85.00%)
Through research, product provides a clear explanation of
cultural factors that influence the development of ethical
relationships in or between cultures.
Through research, product provides a clear evaluation of the
different perspectives on the ethics of developing,
maintaining, or ending relationships in members of different
cultural groups.
Through research, product provides a clear explanation of
how differing cultural values and norms may influence
conflict styles.
Product gives specific illustrations that show different conflict
styles of people from different cultures.
At least nine relevant, scholarly sources are cited in a wellconnected way and elaborated on.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is
apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and
cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are
appropriate to purpose.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Through current research, product provides a clear and
thorough explanation of cultural factors that influence the
development of ethical relationships in or between cultures.
Through current research, product provides a clear and
thorough evaluation of the different perspectives on the
ethics of developing, maintaining, or ending relationships in
members of different cultural groups.
Through current research, product provides a clear and
thorough explanation of how differing cultural values and
norms may influence conflict styles.
Product clearly gives specific illustrations that show different
conflict styles of people from different cultures.
At least nine relevant, scholarly sources are cited and are
flawlessly integrated into the essay to support the claims
made therein.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Comments
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and
transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other.
Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.
Paragraph structure is seamless.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Categories: