Description
Provide an evaluation (750-1,000 words total) of at least five journal articles from Topics 4-6 of this course. Include the following for each article:
- The article citation, which is not included in the total word count.
- A written summary of the key concept(s) of the articles. Consider the following questions: Why were the studies done? What were the populations studied? What did the researcher(s) conclude? How are the research questions or findings similar/different? What other information about these studies do you believe is unique or important to recall? Are there specific statements made by the authors that you wish to retain? How might these articles compare with others you read? What new ideas can come out of the articles you are evaluating?
Morris, S. B., Daisley, R. L., Wheeler, M., & Boyer, P. (2015). A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Individual Assessments and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 5-20. doi: 10.1037/a0036938.
Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C., & Judge, T. A. (2007). In Support of Personality Assessment in Organizational Settings. Personnel Psychology, 60, 995-1027.
Gray, E., & Nathan, G. (2015, June 22). Do you understand why stars twinkle? Would you rather read than watch TV? Do you trust data more than your instincts? Time, 185(23), 40-46.
Hogan, R., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Kaiser, R. B. (2013). Employability and career success: Bridging the gap between theory and reality. Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 6(1), 3-16. doi: 10.1111/iops.12001.
Kaiser, R. B., & Kaplan, R. (2005). Overlooking overkill? Beyond the 1-to-5 rating scale. Human Resource Planning, 28(3), 7-11.
Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
1
Annotated Bibliography Examples
Kenobi, O.W. (1977). Mos Eisley spaceport: A wretched hive of scum and villainy. Journal of
Intergalactic Spaceports, 7, 42-50. doi: 4815162342
Kenobi presents a solid argument for the wretchedness of the Mos Eisley spaceport. His
research is thorough, current, and his claims are well-supported. He examines the
denizens of the spaceport, thoroughly documenting the caliber of their occupations and
characters, setting up a firm argument for their inadequacy as galactic citizens. Based on
a thorough review of the literature, an exhaustive survey of his sample population, and an
analysis of the data using SPSS, he concludes that there is no spaceport more wretched
than Mos Eisley. Based on other literature in the field, and the ample support provided by
Kenobi in this article, the conclusions drawn here seem valid. Kenobi is a prolific
researcher in this field, with 85 publications in peer-reviewed journals, and 5 texts
published with well-regarded academic publishers. This article is published in the leading
journal of spaceport research, indicating credibility for the article and an intended
audience of other spaceport experts.
Skywalker, L. (1981). Dagobah: Swamp planet or treasury trove of secret knowledge? Journal of
Jedi Studies, 77, 293-309. Retrieved from http://www.journalof jedistudies.org
Keep your annotation to about 150-200 words. Note the purpose of the article, the
participants/subject of the study, the conclusions drawn by the author(s), and the validity
of the conclusions. Evaluate the article: is it a credible source? Describe the credibility of
the author – are there any biases? How well did the author support his or her assertions?
Did they provide an adequate literature review? Were there any limitations?
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
2
Solo, H., & Organa, L. (1983). I am not a committee: Building a relationship during a galactic
civil war. Journal of Interpersonal Attraction, 4, 77-90. doi: 934.1701.007
Annotated bibliographies are helpful tools for organizing and preparing for a research
paper or project. Instead of reading articles and forgetting what you’ve read, you can
have a convenient document full of helpful information about the articles you’ve read. In
addition to helping you remember what you have read, an annotated bibliography can
help you see the bigger picture of the literature you are reading. It can help you visualize
the overall status of the topic, as well as where your unique question might fit in.
Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
1
Annotated Bibliography Examples
Kenobi, O.W. (1977). Mos Eisley spaceport: A wretched hive of scum and villainy. Journal of
Intergalactic Spaceports, 7, 42-50. doi: 4815162342
Kenobi presents a solid argument for the wretchedness of the Mos Eisley spaceport. His
research is thorough, current, and his claims are well-supported. He examines the
denizens of the spaceport, thoroughly documenting the caliber of their occupations and
characters, setting up a firm argument for their inadequacy as galactic citizens. Based on
a thorough review of the literature, an exhaustive survey of his sample population, and an
analysis of the data using SPSS, he concludes that there is no spaceport more wretched
than Mos Eisley. Based on other literature in the field, and the ample support provided by
Kenobi in this article, the conclusions drawn here seem valid. Kenobi is a prolific
researcher in this field, with 85 publications in peer-reviewed journals, and 5 texts
published with well-regarded academic publishers. This article is published in the leading
journal of spaceport research, indicating credibility for the article and an intended
audience of other spaceport experts.
Skywalker, L. (1981). Dagobah: Swamp planet or treasury trove of secret knowledge? Journal of
Jedi Studies, 77, 293-309. Retrieved from http://www.journalof jedistudies.org
Keep your annotation to about 150-200 words. Note the purpose of the article, the
participants/subject of the study, the conclusions drawn by the author(s), and the validity
of the conclusions. Evaluate the article: is it a credible source? Describe the credibility of
the author – are there any biases? How well did the author support his or her assertions?
Did they provide an adequate literature review? Were there any limitations?
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
2
Solo, H., & Organa, L. (1983). I am not a committee: Building a relationship during a galactic
civil war. Journal of Interpersonal Attraction, 4, 77-90. doi: 934.1701.007
Annotated bibliographies are helpful tools for organizing and preparing for a research
paper or project. Instead of reading articles and forgetting what you’ve read, you can
have a convenient document full of helpful information about the articles you’ve read. In
addition to helping you remember what you have read, an annotated bibliography can
help you see the bigger picture of the literature you are reading. It can help you visualize
the overall status of the topic, as well as where your unique question might fit in.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
1
Annotated Bibliography Examples
Kenobi, O.W. (1977). Mos Eisley spaceport: A wretched hive of scum and villainy. Journal of
Intergalactic Spaceports, 7, 42-50. doi: 4815162342
Kenobi presents a solid argument for the wretchedness of the Mos Eisley spaceport. His
research is thorough, current, and his claims are well-supported. He examines the
denizens of the spaceport, thoroughly documenting the caliber of their occupations and
characters, setting up a firm argument for their inadequacy as galactic citizens. Based on
a thorough review of the literature, an exhaustive survey of his sample population, and an
analysis of the data using SPSS, he concludes that there is no spaceport more wretched
than Mos Eisley. Based on other literature in the field, and the ample support provided by
Kenobi in this article, the conclusions drawn here seem valid. Kenobi is a prolific
researcher in this field, with 85 publications in peer-reviewed journals, and 5 texts
published with well-regarded academic publishers. This article is published in the leading
journal of spaceport research, indicating credibility for the article and an intended
audience of other spaceport experts.
Skywalker, L. (1981). Dagobah: Swamp planet or treasury trove of secret knowledge? Journal of
Jedi Studies, 77, 293-309. Retrieved from http://www.journalof jedistudies.org
Keep your annotation to about 150-200 words. Note the purpose of the article, the
participants/subject of the study, the conclusions drawn by the author(s), and the validity
of the conclusions. Evaluate the article: is it a credible source? Describe the credibility of
the author – are there any biases? How well did the author support his or her assertions?
Did they provide an adequate literature review? Were there any limitations?
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
2
Solo, H., & Organa, L. (1983). I am not a committee: Building a relationship during a galactic
civil war. Journal of Interpersonal Attraction, 4, 77-90. doi: 934.1701.007
Annotated bibliographies are helpful tools for organizing and preparing for a research
paper or project. Instead of reading articles and forgetting what you’ve read, you can
have a convenient document full of helpful information about the articles you’ve read. In
addition to helping you remember what you have read, an annotated bibliography can
help you see the bigger picture of the literature you are reading. It can help you visualize
the overall status of the topic, as well as where your unique question might fit in.
Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
1
Annotated Bibliography Examples
Kenobi, O.W. (1977). Mos Eisley spaceport: A wretched hive of scum and villainy. Journal of
Intergalactic Spaceports, 7, 42-50. doi: 4815162342
Kenobi presents a solid argument for the wretchedness of the Mos Eisley spaceport. His
research is thorough, current, and his claims are well-supported. He examines the
denizens of the spaceport, thoroughly documenting the caliber of their occupations and
characters, setting up a firm argument for their inadequacy as galactic citizens. Based on
a thorough review of the literature, an exhaustive survey of his sample population, and an
analysis of the data using SPSS, he concludes that there is no spaceport more wretched
than Mos Eisley. Based on other literature in the field, and the ample support provided by
Kenobi in this article, the conclusions drawn here seem valid. Kenobi is a prolific
researcher in this field, with 85 publications in peer-reviewed journals, and 5 texts
published with well-regarded academic publishers. This article is published in the leading
journal of spaceport research, indicating credibility for the article and an intended
audience of other spaceport experts.
Skywalker, L. (1981). Dagobah: Swamp planet or treasury trove of secret knowledge? Journal of
Jedi Studies, 77, 293-309. Retrieved from http://www.journalof jedistudies.org
Keep your annotation to about 150-200 words. Note the purpose of the article, the
participants/subject of the study, the conclusions drawn by the author(s), and the validity
of the conclusions. Evaluate the article: is it a credible source? Describe the credibility of
the author – are there any biases? How well did the author support his or her assertions?
Did they provide an adequate literature review? Were there any limitations?
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
2
Solo, H., & Organa, L. (1983). I am not a committee: Building a relationship during a galactic
civil war. Journal of Interpersonal Attraction, 4, 77-90. doi: 934.1701.007
Annotated bibliographies are helpful tools for organizing and preparing for a research
paper or project. Instead of reading articles and forgetting what you’ve read, you can
have a convenient document full of helpful information about the articles you’ve read. In
addition to helping you remember what you have read, an annotated bibliography can
help you see the bigger picture of the literature you are reading. It can help you visualize
the overall status of the topic, as well as where your unique question might fit in.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Categories: