Description
The Epidemiology Paper is a practice immersion assignment
designed to be completed in three sections, this is part one of the assignment.
Learners are required discuss the role of descriptive epidemiology in nursing
science and apply descriptive epidemiology in nursing science.
General Guidelines:
Use the following information to ensure successful
completion of the assignment:
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric
prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their
writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success
Center.
This assignment requires that support your position by
referencing at least six to eight scholarly resources. At least three of your
supporting references must be from scholarly sources other than the assigned
readings.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Write a 1,250–1,500 word paper discussing the role of
descriptive epidemiology in nursing science. Include the following:
Define descriptive epidemiology and describe its
relationship and role in nursing science today.
Provide a contemporary example of how descriptive
epidemiology is applied in public health nursing.
Identify the epidemiology components used to analyze at-risk
populations.
Course Code
DNP-825
Class Code
DNP-825-IO7110
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Demonstrates an Understanding of Descriptive
Epidemiology and Its Relationship to Nursing
Science and Public Health Nursing
20.0%
Uses Contemporary Theories, Concepts, and
Examples That Demonstrate an Ability to
Identify, Analyze, and Apply Descriptive
Epidemiology
20.0%
Demonstrates Knowledge of Health Disparities
and the Variables Contributing to Health
Disparity or At-Risk Populations
20.0%
Six to Eight Additional Scholarly Research
Sources With In-Text Citations
10.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Research Citations (in-text citations for
paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference
page listing and formatting, as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Epidemiology Paper Part One: Descriptive Method
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Paper does not demonstrate an understanding of descriptive
epidemiology or its relationship to nursing science and public
health nursing.
Paper does not use contemporary theories, concepts, or
examples as support or in the analysis of the paper.
Paper does not demonstrate knowledge of health disparities,
or of the variables contributing to health disparity or at-risk
populations.
None of the required elements (minimum of six topic-related
scholarly research sources and six in-text citations) are
present.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice
and/or sentence construction are used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Total Points
200.0
Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)
Paper shows a vague understanding of descriptive
epidemiology, but does not demonstrate an understanding of
the relationship to nursing science and public health nursing.
Paper uses some aspects of contemporary theories and
concepts throughout the paper, but no relevant examples are
used. Overall, the concepts and theories used are incomplete
or inaccurate and do not support the analysis or application
of descriptive epidemiology.
Paper demonstrates a rudimentary knowledge of the concept
of health disparities, but does not demonstrate knowledge of
the dimensions of disparity in a realistic setting, or of the
variables contributing to the disparity or at-risk populations.
Not all required elements are present. One or more elements
are missing and/or included sources are not scholarly
research or topic-related.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or
vague; purpose is not clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or
word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but
not varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
Paper illustrates a general understanding of descriptive
epidemiology, and shows a general relationship to nursing
science and public health nursing, but lacks a clear
understanding of data collection, conditions, or distribution
and determinants in relationship to disease in populations.
Paper uses contemporary theories and concepts throughout
the paper, and general examples are used for support.
Overall, the concepts and theories used are very general and
offer only minor support of the analysis or application of
descriptive epidemiology presented in the paper.
Paper demonstrates general knowledge of the dimensions of
health disparities that occur in a realistic setting and identifies
some general variables contributing to the disparity and the
at-risk populations.
All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources
are topic-related, but the source and quality of one or more
references is questionable.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to
purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the
paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although
some errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
Paper illustrates a theoretical understanding of descriptive
epidemiology through an accurate discussion of distribution
and disease determinants in populations. Paper
demonstrates the functional relationship between descriptive
epidemiology and nursing science and public health nursing.
Paper uses contemporary theories and concepts throughout
the paper. Accurate and strong examples are used for
support. Overall, the concepts and theories provide support
of the analysis and application of descriptive epidemiology
presented in the paper.
Paper demonstrates knowledge of the dimensions of health
disparities that occur in a realistic setting and identifies
specific variables contributing to health disparities and at-risk
populations.
All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources
are topic-related and obtained from reputable, professional
sources.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the
development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of
the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is
usually correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Comments
Paper illustrates a theoretical and conceptual understanding
of descriptive epidemiology and offers insight into using
specific conditions (outcomes of exposure, person, place,
etc.) to identify specific patterns. Paper shows the significant
relationship between descriptive epidemiology and
contemporary nursing science and public health nursing.
Paper uses contemporary theories and concepts throughout
the paper. Accurate and strong examples are used for
support. Overall, the concepts and theories provide support
of the analysis and application of descriptive epidemiology
presented in the paper.
Paper demonstrates keen knowledge and unbiased insight
pertaining to the dimensions of health disparities that occur
in a realistic setting. Paper identifies significant variables from
a broad spectrum that contribute to health disparities and atrisk populations.
All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources
are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected,
professional, original sources.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of
the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and
correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
DNP-825
Class Code
DNP-825-IO7110
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Demonstrates an Understanding of Descriptive
Epidemiology and Its Relationship to Nursing
Science and Public Health Nursing
20.0%
Uses Contemporary Theories, Concepts, and
Examples That Demonstrate an Ability to
Identify, Analyze, and Apply Descriptive
Epidemiology
20.0%
Demonstrates Knowledge of Health Disparities
and the Variables Contributing to Health
Disparity or At-Risk Populations
20.0%
Six to Eight Additional Scholarly Research
Sources With In-Text Citations
10.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Research Citations (in-text citations for
paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference
page listing and formatting, as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Epidemiology Paper Part One: Descriptive Method
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Paper does not demonstrate an understanding of descriptive
epidemiology or its relationship to nursing science and public
health nursing.
Paper does not use contemporary theories, concepts, or
examples as support or in the analysis of the paper.
Paper does not demonstrate knowledge of health disparities,
or of the variables contributing to health disparity or at-risk
populations.
None of the required elements (minimum of six topic-related
scholarly research sources and six in-text citations) are
present.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice
and/or sentence construction are used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Total Points
200.0
Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)
Paper shows a vague understanding of descriptive
epidemiology, but does not demonstrate an understanding of
the relationship to nursing science and public health nursing.
Paper uses some aspects of contemporary theories and
concepts throughout the paper, but no relevant examples are
used. Overall, the concepts and theories used are incomplete
or inaccurate and do not support the analysis or application
of descriptive epidemiology.
Paper demonstrates a rudimentary knowledge of the concept
of health disparities, but does not demonstrate knowledge of
the dimensions of disparity in a realistic setting, or of the
variables contributing to the disparity or at-risk populations.
Not all required elements are present. One or more elements
are missing and/or included sources are not scholarly
research or topic-related.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or
vague; purpose is not clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or
word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but
not varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
Paper illustrates a general understanding of descriptive
epidemiology, and shows a general relationship to nursing
science and public health nursing, but lacks a clear
understanding of data collection, conditions, or distribution
and determinants in relationship to disease in populations.
Paper uses contemporary theories and concepts throughout
the paper, and general examples are used for support.
Overall, the concepts and theories used are very general and
offer only minor support of the analysis or application of
descriptive epidemiology presented in the paper.
Paper demonstrates general knowledge of the dimensions of
health disparities that occur in a realistic setting and identifies
some general variables contributing to the disparity and the
at-risk populations.
All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources
are topic-related, but the source and quality of one or more
references is questionable.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to
purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the
paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although
some errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
Paper illustrates a theoretical understanding of descriptive
epidemiology through an accurate discussion of distribution
and disease determinants in populations. Paper
demonstrates the functional relationship between descriptive
epidemiology and nursing science and public health nursing.
Paper uses contemporary theories and concepts throughout
the paper. Accurate and strong examples are used for
support. Overall, the concepts and theories provide support
of the analysis and application of descriptive epidemiology
presented in the paper.
Paper demonstrates knowledge of the dimensions of health
disparities that occur in a realistic setting and identifies
specific variables contributing to health disparities and at-risk
populations.
All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources
are topic-related and obtained from reputable, professional
sources.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the
development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of
the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is
usually correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Comments
Paper illustrates a theoretical and conceptual understanding
of descriptive epidemiology and offers insight into using
specific conditions (outcomes of exposure, person, place,
etc.) to identify specific patterns. Paper shows the significant
relationship between descriptive epidemiology and
contemporary nursing science and public health nursing.
Paper uses contemporary theories and concepts throughout
the paper. Accurate and strong examples are used for
support. Overall, the concepts and theories provide support
of the analysis and application of descriptive epidemiology
presented in the paper.
Paper demonstrates keen knowledge and unbiased insight
pertaining to the dimensions of health disparities that occur
in a realistic setting. Paper identifies significant variables from
a broad spectrum that contribute to health disparities and atrisk populations.
All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources
are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected,
professional, original sources.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of
the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and
correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Categories: