Essay Grade

Two assignments for you
This is the first one due on November 17, 2021, items below. I will also provide the rubric for this assignment. I need
you to write for me a 2 -3-minute spill to make a video.
Rubric requirements below
Introduction score5. Target
A thorough, yet brief introduction is included in the video.
Overview of 5 components of reading
Overview of the five components of reading and how they connect to writing is skillfully included
Instructional Strategies
Creative instructional strategies for teaching/reinforcing the five components of reading and writing are
included.
Assessment and Progress Monitoring
The importance of assessment/progress monitoring is thoughtfully discussed and strategies to help
teachers track student progress are proficiently identified
Online Resources
An innovative online resource is included that provides support specific to students who are struggling with
reading or writing.
Ways Reading/literary Specialist Can help support teachers
Explanation of how reading/literacy specialists can help support teachers is insightful and detailed
Research
Research is supportive of the information presented. Sources are timely, distinctive and clearly address all
the criteria stated in the assignment.
Overall Presentation
The work is well presented. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Work would be highly
presentable to school colleagues
Format and Documentation of Sources
Format and Documentation of Sources (layout, citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style. Format is free of
error
Assignment
Review Details
Take a moment to review the details of this assignment below and gather any necessary files. Once you’re ready to
submit your assignment, move on to Step 2.
Assessment Description
Reading/Literacy specialists often provide professional development, lead PLC groups, and provide resources to
classroom teachers. Identifying and preparing a resource tool to support teachers in developing appropriate reading
strategies will assist the reading/literacy specialist in gaining deeper insights into the appropriate use of strategies.
You were asked to present on the components of reading and instructional strategies and resources at an upcoming
literacy conference for reading/literacy specialists and elementary teachers. Develop a 3-5 minute video presentation
using any video recording device.
Include the following in your video presentation:
•
•
A brief introduction of yourself
A brief overview of the five components of reading and how they connect to writing
One instructional strategy for teaching/reinforcing each of the five components of reading plus one for
writing
• The importance of assessment and progress monitoring and 2-3 strategies to help teachers track student
progress
• One online resource that will help teachers support struggling readers and writers
• Ways the reading/literacy specialist can help support students and teachers
Use an online video platform such as Loom, YouTube, or Vimeo to upload your completed video. Ensure that others
can access and view your linked video prior to submitting to the LMS.
Show professionalism in your speech and appearance.
Support your video with a minimum of three scholarly resources.
Submit a Word document that contains the link to the video presentation as well as documentation of sources used in
the assignment
•
Reading Resources:
1. Classroom Reading Instruction that Supports Struggling Readers: Key Components for Effective Teaching. Read
“Classroom Reading Instruction that Supports Struggling Readers: Key Components for Effective
Teaching,” by Denton,
http://www.rtinetwork.org/essential/tieredinstruction/tier1/effectiveteaching
2. Read “6 Elementary Reading Strategies That Really Work,” by Minero, located on the Edu topia website
(2019).https://www.edutopia.org/article/6-elementary-reading-strategies-really-work
3. Read “Five Ways to Help Struggling Readers Build Reading Fluency,” by Gilfeather, located on the ILA website
(2018). https://www.literacyworldwide.org/blog/literacy-now/2018/04/18/five-ways-to-help-strugglingreaders-build-reading-fluency
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Teaching Reading in the 21st Century: Motivating All Learners chapters 5 -7
https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9780135170007/epub/OPS/xhtml/toc.html#page_993
Read “A New Priority,” by Stahl, from Reading Teacher (2016).
Read “The Four Keys to Motivating Struggling Readers,” located on the Reading Horizons website (2013).
https://www.readinghorizons.com/blog/post/2013/01/23/four-keys-to-motivating-struggling-readers
Read “7 Strategies to Use with Struggling Readers,” located on the Edutopia website (2015).
https://www.edutopia.org/discussion/7-strategies-use-struggling-readers
Assignment 2 Due November 24 2021 NEED TO HAVE IT BY NOVEMBER 22
BECAUSE OF THE THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY
I WILL UPLOAD THE 3 DAY UNIT PLAN AND SEND YOU A SAMPLE I WILL
PROVIDE YOU WITH OUR UNITS OF STUDY AND YOU CAN SELECT A
NARRATIVE AND INFORMATIONAL TEXT. IT WILL HAVE ALL OF THE
STANDARDS WE PROBABLY CAN USE A SOCIAL STUDY STANDARD, I WILL
PROVIDE AND ATTACH ELA AND SOCIAL STUDIES STANDARD.K Will pay $100.
Have to have both of these on time. I am currently doing both assignment
this week. Also I will send you samples.
Review Details
Take a moment to review the details of this assignment below and gather any necessary files. Once you’re ready to
submit your assignment, move on to Step 2.
Assessment Description
Creating relevant and meaningful literacy units for students and teachers is essential for reading/literacy specialists.
The reading/literacy specialist can demonstrate effective, evidence-based strategies for teaching reading across the
curriculum that meets the needs of all students in a classroom.
Using the “3-Day Unit Plan Template,” design a cross-curricular literacy unit for a grade level of your choice (K-8).
Your unit plan should focus on word recognition, language comprehension, strategic knowledge, and reading -writing
connections. Include differentiated activities to meet the needs of all students.
The unit plan should include:
•
•
At least one informational and one narrative text that meet the literacy needs of all students.
At least one English language arts state standard and at least one state standard from another content area.
Each lesson should include:
•
•
•
Multiple Means of Representation: Design evidence-based strategies to present literacy content in various
ways that meets the needs of all students.
Multiple Means of Engagement: Adapt the evidence-based literacy curriculum and resources to meet the
needs of all students as they explore, practice, and apply literacy content.
Multiple Means of Expression: Select evidence-based literacy assessments to evaluate instruction and monitor
student progress to meet the needs of all students.
Following the unit plan, write a 250-500 word analysis of the relationship between reading, writing, and language in
the development of literacy skills. How will this information affect your current or future professional practice ?
Support your unit plan and analysis with a minimum of three scholarly resources.
State Standards
DECONSTRUCTED
CLASSROOM IMPACT
SEVENTH

#

&
‘

(
)

*

$

%

!

”
Introduction
The Common Core Institute is pleased to offer this grade-level tool for educators who are teaching with the Common
Core State Standards.
The Common Core Standards Deconstructed for Classroom Impact is designed for educators by educators as a twopronged resource and tool 1) to help educators increase their depth of understanding of the Common Core Standards
and 2) to enable teachers to plan College & Career Ready curriculum and classroom instruction that promotes inquiry
and higher levels of cognitive demand.
What we have done is not new. This work is a purposeful and thoughtful compilation of preexisting materials in the
public domain, state department of education websites, and original work by the Center for College & Career Readiness.
Among the works that have been compiled and/or referenced are the following: Common Core State Standards for
ELA/Literacy and the Appendix from the Common Core State Standards Initiative; the North Carolina Department of
Public Instruction, the Delaware Department of Education; and numerous Literacy experts across the country.
We hope you will find the concentrated and consolidated resource of value in your own planning. We also hope you
will use this resource to facilitate discussion with your colleagues and, perhaps, as a lever to help assess targeted
professional learning opportunities.
Understanding the Organization
The Overview includes Anchor Standards for Reading which are mirrored in the ELA Common Core Standards
themselves. This ensures you have the Anchor Standards easily accessible at all times. One of the key features of the
Anchor Standards for Reading is the structure of four organizing areas: Key Ideas and Details, Craft and Structure,
Integration of Knowledge and Ideas, and Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity.
The overall composition of the sections that follow is guided by the domain—Reading Literature (RL), Reading
Foundation (RF), etc.—which you might consider the domain or area of literacy, and the organizing content area (Key
Ideas and Details, Craft and Structure, Integration of Knowledge and Ideas, and Range of Reading and Level of Text
Complexity) of the Anchor Standards for Reading.
Each section begins with the Domain. Again, this represents the area or domain of literacy: reading literature (RL),
reading foundation (RF), etc. Think of the domain as a sort of header as the content will reflect standards-focused
information within that domain. When each organizing area of the Anchor Standards has been referenced, as
appropriate, the same format will be followed for the each subsequent domain.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS DECONSTRUCTED FOR CLASSROOM IMPACT
+
SEVENTH
&
‘
(
)
*
LEXILE GRADE LEVEL BAND: 970L TO 1120L
What follows the Domain and Domain Text are the core anchor standards for an organizing area (i.e., Key Ideas and
Details). Next is the Critical Focus or some of the specific learner outcomes related to this domain and the organizing
area.
The Big Idea captures the essence of this organizing area (i.e., Key Ideas and Details) for this particular domain (i.e.,
Reading Literature). Think of this an overarching guiding concept.
Academic Vocabulary supports the Big Idea and Critical Focus and is meant to help you distinguish some of the
specific academic vocabulary your students will encounter.
Moving deeper and more explicitly into the Anchor Reading Standard is then the grade-specific standard and
deconstruction with the Standard Number and the Standard Statement.
For each Standard Number and Standard Statement are Essential Question(s), Learning Progressions, DOK
Range for Instruction & Assessment with the accompanying Instructional Targets of Know: Concepts/Skills,
Think, and Do, and Key Strategies.
The Essential Question(s) enable you to focus your instructional strategies and learning objectives as you plan. The
Learning Progressions are contextual in that the current standard is bracketed by the grade-level standard for the
preceding and the following grades. This helps remind you of the proficiency level with your students enter your
grade and the proficiency expectations for the next grade. The DOK Range for Instruction & Assessment with the
accompanying Instructional Targets of Know: Concepts/Skills, Think, and Do offer you further detail to support
planning for instructional practice and student learning. The last feature is the Key Strategies. As your refine your
planning in conjunction with student learning objectives that align to the instructional targets, you can refer to the
Key Strategies for ideas to ensure you have sufficient differentiation and variety in your classroom to help students
achieve the instructional targets and move towards mastery of the standard.
,
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS DECONSTRUCTED FOR CLASSROOM IMPACT
OVERVIEW
OVERVIEW
Key Design Considerations
CCR and grade-specific standards
The CCR standards anchor the document and define general, cross-disciplinary literacy expectations that must be
met for students to be prepared to enter college and workforce training programs ready to succeed. The K–12 gradespecific standards define end-of-year expectations and a cumulative progression designed to enable students to meet
college and career readiness expectations no later than the end of high school. The CCR and high school (grades 9–12)
standards work in tandem to define the college and career readiness line—the former providing broad standards, the
latter providing additional specificity. Hence, both should be considered when developing college and career readiness
assessments.
Students advancing through the grades are expected to meet each year’s grade specific standards, retain or further
develop skills and understandings mastered in preceding grades, and work steadily toward meeting the more general
expectations described by the CCR standards.
Grade levels for K–8; grade bands for 9–10 and 11–12
The Standards use individual grade levels in kindergarten through grade 8 to provide useful specificity; the Standards
use two-year bands in grades 9–12 to allow schools, districts, and states flexibility in high school course design.
A focus on results rather than means
By emphasizing required achievements, the Standards leave room for teachers, curriculum developers, and states to
determine how those goals should be reached and what additional topics should be addressed. Thus, the Standards do
not mandate such things as a particular writing process or the full range of metacognitive strategies that students may
need to monitor and direct their thinking and learning. Teachers are thus free to provide students with whatever tools
and knowledge their professional judgment and experience identify as most helpful for meeting the goals set out in
the Standards.
An integrated model of literacy
Although the Standards are divided into Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening, and Language domains for
conceptual clarity, the processes of communication are closely connected, as reflected throughout this document.
For example, Writing standard 9 requires that students be able to write about what they read. Likewise, Speaking and
Listening standard 4 sets the expectation that students will share findings from their research.
Research and media skills blended into the Standards as a whole
To be ready for college, workforce training, and life in a technological society, students need the ability to gather,
comprehend, evaluate, synthesize, and report on information and ideas, to conduct original research in order to answer
questions or solve problems, and to analyze and create a high volume and extensive range of print and nonprint texts
in media forms old and new. The need to conduct research and to produce and consume media is embedded into every
aspect of today’s curriculum. In like fashion, research and media skills and understandings are embedded throughout
the Standards rather than treated in a separate section.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS DECONSTRUCTED FOR CLASSROOM IMPACT
–
SEVENTH
&
‘
(
)
*
LEXILE GRADE LEVEL BAND: 970L TO 1120L
Shared responsibility for students’ literacy development
The Standards insist that instruction in reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language be a shared responsibility
within the school. The K–5 standards include expectations for reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language
applicable to a range of subjects, including but not limited to ELA. The grades
6–12 standards are divided into two sections, one for ELA and the other for history/social studies, science, and
technical subjects. This division reflects the unique, time-honored place of ELA teachers in developing students’
literacy skills while at the same time recognizing that teachers in other areas must have a role in this development as
well.
Part of the motivation behind the interdisciplinary approach to literacy promulgated by the Standards is extensive
research establishing the need for college and career ready students to be proficient in reading complex
informational text independently in a variety of content areas. Most of the required reading in college and workforce
training programs is informational in structure and challenging in content; postsecondary education programs
typically provide students with both a higher volume of such reading than is generally required in K–12 schools and
comparatively little scaffolding.
The Standards are not alone in calling for a special emphasis on informational text. The 2009 reading framework of
the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) requires a high and increasing proportion of informational
text on its assessment as students advance through the grades.
Distribution of Literary and Informational Passages by Grade in the 2009 NAEP
Reading Framework
Grade
4
8
12
Literary
50%
45%
30%
Informational
50%
55%
70%
Source: National Assessment Governing Board. (2008). Reading framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational
Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
The Standards aim to align instruction with this framework so that many more students than at present can meet
the requirements of college and career readiness. In K–5, the Standards follow NAEP’s lead in balancing the reading
of literature with the reading of informational texts, including texts in history/social studies, science, and technical
subjects. In accord with NAEP’s growing emphasis on informational texts in the higher grades, the Standards demand
that a significant amount of reading of informational texts take place in and outside the ELA classroom. Fulfilling
the Standards for 6–12 ELA requires much greater attention to a specific category of informational text—literary
nonfiction—than has been traditional. Because the ELA classroom must focus on literature (stories, drama, and
poetry) as well as literary nonfiction, a great deal of informational reading in grade 7 must take place in other classes
if the NAEP assessment framework is to be matched instructionally.1 To measure students’ growth toward college
and career readiness, assessments aligned with the Standards should adhere to the distribution of texts across grades
cited in the NAEP framework.
.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS DECONSTRUCTED FOR CLASSROOM IMPACT
OVERVIEW
NAEP likewise outlines a distribution across the grades of the core purposes and types of student writing. The 2011
NAEP framework, like the Standards, cultivates the development of three mutually reinforcing writing capacities:
writing to persuade, to explain, and to convey real or imagined experience. Evidence concerning the demands of
college and career readiness gathered during development of the Standards concurs with NAEP’s shifting emphases:
standards for grades 9–12 describe writing in all three forms, but, consistent with NAEP, the overwhelming focus of
writing throughout high school should be on arguments and informative/explanatory texts.2
1The percentages on the table reflect the sum of student reading, not just reading in ELA settings. Teachers of senior
English classes, for example, are not required to devote 70 percent of reading to informational texts. Rather, 70 percent
of student reading across the grade should be informational.
2As with reading, the percentages in the table reflect the sum of student writing, not just writing in ELA settings.
Distribution of Communicative Purposes by Grade in the 2011 NAEP Writing
Framework
Grade
4
8
To Persuade
30%
35%
To Explain
35%
35%
12
40%
40%
To Convey Experience
35%
30%
20%
Source: National Assessment Governing Board. (2007). Writing framework for the 2007 National Assessment of Educational
Progress. pre-publication edition. Iowa City, IA: ACT, Inc.
It follows that writing assessments aligned with the Standards should adhere to the distribution of writing purposes
across grades outlined by NAEP.
Focus and coherence in instruction and assessment
While the Standards delineate specific expectations in reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language, each
standard need not be a separate focus for instruction and assessment. Often, several standards can be addressed by
a single rich task. For example, when editing writing, students address Writing standard 5 (“Develop and strengthen
writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach”) as well as Language standards
1–3 (which deal with conventions of standard English and knowledge of language).
When drawing evidence from literary and informational texts per Writing standard 9, students are also demonstrating
their comprehension skill in relation to specific standards in Reading. When discussing something they have read or
written, students are also demonstrating their speaking and listening skills. The CCR anchor standards themselves
provide another source of focus and coherence.
The same ten CCR anchor standards for Reading apply to both literary and informational texts, including texts in
history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. The ten CCR anchor standards for Writing cover numerous
text types and subject areas. This means that students can develop mutually reinforcing skills and exhibit mastery of
standards for reading and writing across a range of texts and classrooms.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS DECONSTRUCTED FOR CLASSROOM IMPACT
/
SEVENTH
&
‘
(
)
*
LEXILE GRADE LEVEL BAND: 970L TO 1120L
Students Who are College and Career Ready in Reading, Writing, Speaking,
Listening, and Language
The descriptions that follow are not standards themselves but instead ofer a portrait of students who meet the standards
set out in this document. As students advance through the grades and master the standards in reading, writing,
speaking, listening, and language, they are able to exhibit with increasing fullness and regularity these capacities of the
literate individual.
They demonstrate independence.
Students can, without significant scaffolding, comprehend and evaluate complex texts across a range of types and
disciplines, and they can construct effective arguments and convey intricate or multifaceted information. Likewise,
students are able independently to discern a speaker’s key points, request clarification, and ask relevant questions. They
build on others’ ideas, articulate their own ideas, and confirm they have been understood. Without prompting, they
demonstrate command of standard English and acquire and use a wide-ranging vocabulary. More broadly, they become
self-directed learners, effectively seeking out and using resources to assist them, including teachers, peers, and print and
digital reference materials.
They build strong content knowledge.
Students establish a base of knowledge across a wide range of subject matter by engaging with works of quality
and substance. They become proficient in new areas through research and study. They read purposefully and listen
attentively to gain both general knowledge and discipline-specific expertise. They refine and share their knowledge
through writing and speaking.
They respond to the varying demands of audience, task, purpose, and discipline.
Students adapt their communication in relation to audience, task, purpose, and discipline. They set and adjust purpose
for reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language use as warranted by the task. They appreciate nuances, such
as how the composition of an audience should affect tone when speaking and how the connotations of words affect
meaning. They also know that different disciplines call for different types of evidence (e.g., documentary evidence in
history, experimental evidence in science).
They comprehend as well as critique.
Students are engaged and open-minded—but discerning—readers and listeners. they work diligently to understand
precisely what an author or speaker is saying, but they also question an author’s or speaker’s assumptions and premises
and assess the veracity of claims and the soundness of reasoning.
They value evidence.
Students cite specific evidence when offering an oral or written interpretation of a text. they use relevant evidence when
supporting their own points in writing and speaking, making their reasoning clear to the reader or listener, and they
constructively evaluate others’ use of evidence.
0
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS DECONSTRUCTED FOR CLASSROOM IMPACT
They use technology and digital media strategically and capably.
Students employ technology thoughtfully to enhance their reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language use. they tailor their searches online
to acquire useful information efficiently, and they integrate what they learn using technology with what they learn offline. they are familiar with the
strengths and limitations of various technological tools and mediums and can select and use those best suited to their communication goals.
They come to understand other perspectives and cultures.
Students appreciate that the twenty-first-century classroom and workplace are settings in which people from often widely divergent cultures
and who represent diverse experiences and perspectives must learn and work together. Students actively seek to understand other perspectives
and cultures through reading and listening, and they are able to communicate effectively with people of varied backgrounds. they evaluate other
points of view critically and constructively. through reading great classic and contemporary works of literature representative of a variety of periods,
cultures, and world views, students can vicariously inhabit worlds and have experiences much different than their own.
LITERACY DOMAIN: READING
READING ANCHOR
STANDARDS FOR
LITERATURE
(RL)
SEVENTH
1
2
3
4
5
SEVENTH
&
‘
(
)
*
LEXILE GRADE LEVEL BAND: 970L TO 1120L
College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for
Reading
The grade 7 standards on the following pages define what students should understand and be able to do by the end
of the grade. They correspond to the College and Career Readiness (CCR) anchor standards below by number. The CCR
and grade-specific standards are necessary complements—the former providing broad standards, the latter providing
additional specificity—that together define the skills and understandings that all students must demonstrate.
Key Ideas and Details
1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual
evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.
2. Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summarize the key supporting details and
ideas.
3. Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop and interact over the course of a text.
Craft and Structure
4. Interpret words and phrases as they are used in a text, including determining technical, connotative, and figurative
meanings, and analyze how specific word choices shape meaning or tone.
5. Analyze the structure of texts, including how specific sentences, paragraphs, and larger portions of the text (e.g., a
section, chapter, scene, or stanza) relate to each other and the whole.
6. Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text.
Integration of Knowledge and Ideas
7. Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse media and formats, including visually and quantitatively, as well
as in words.*
8. Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the reasoning as well as the
relevance and sufficiency of the evidence.
9. Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the
approaches the authors take.
Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity
10. Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.
*Please see “Research to Build and Present Knowledge” in Writing and “Comprehension and Collaboration” in Speaking and
Listening for additional standards relevant to gathering, assessing, and applying information from print and digital sources.
6
7
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS DECONSTRUCTED FOR CLASSROOM IMPACT
Key Ideas and Details
LITERATURE
ANCHOR
READING
STANDARDS
1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences
from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions
drawn from the text.
2. Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development;
summarize the key supporting details and ideas.
3. Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop and interact over the
course of a text.
CRITICAL FOCUS
LEARNER
OUTCOMES
Seventh grade students develop the ability to gather more than one piece of evidence to support their thinking
about the texts they read.
Students need to be able to find pieces of relevant evidence that not only support their thinking, but are linked
together to a common idea or conclusion. In order to do this work, students need practice in locating, evaluating,
and categorizing evidence and linking this evidence to conclusions or claims they have made about the text.
At this level, seventh grade students continue to make inferences and draw conclusions based upon the
relationship between the support (key details) they find in the text and the background information they bring to
the reading.
Seventh grade students take notice of the author’s use of coherent language to build relationships between ideas
and evidence in a text. They can use partner, small group and whole class discussion as well as note-taking and
graphic organizers to clarify their thinking about the development of the author’s theme over time within a text.
Seventh grade students read the text closely so as to analyze the impact specific story elements have on the text.
BIG IDEA
ACADEMIC
VOCABULARY
•
We read to develop as people and citizens in our global society.
•
We make interpretations and draw conclusions both from what we read and experience in life.
analogy, anecdote, assumption/assume, clarify, clause (adverb, introductory, etc.), compile, contract, convention,
culture, documentary, exposition (literary), expository writing, expression (emphasis, stress, etc. in oral language),
fluency, imagery, inconsistency, infinitive, interpretation, literary elements (irony, mood, foreshadowing, flashback,
tone, symbolism), parallel structure, projection, prose, revision, sentence structure, stereotype, strategy, types of
poetry, viewpoint
6
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS DECONSTRUCTED FOR CLASSROOM IMPACT
+
SEVENTH
&
‘
(
)
*
LEXILE GRADE LEVEL BAND: 970L TO 1120L
ANCHOR
READING
STANDARD
RL.1
Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite
specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.
GRADE SPECIFIC STANDARD AND DECONSTRUCTION

:
@
;
;
9
8
B
<
8
9
=
>

Cite several pieces of textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn
from the text.

9
?
A
:
F
:

E
;
=
:
8
8
?
:
>
;
B
<
<
;
C
>
>
B
<
;
D
How can I provide proof of what I have learned from different kinds of text?
6th Grade
Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences
drawn from the text.
7th Grade
Cite several pieces of textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as
inferences drawn from the text.
8th Grade
Cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports an analysis of what the text says explicitly as
well as inferences drawn from the text.
E
<
;
DOK Range Target
for Instruction &
Assessment
T1
T3
c4
Know: Concepts/Skills
Instructional Targets:
Students should
be able to:
T2
Think
Identify inferences from a text.
Explicitly analyze what a text says.
Identify explicit information from a
text.
Formulate inferences from textual
material.
Recognize credible resources/
sources.
Cite resources that support analysis.
Do
KEY STRATEGIES
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Fiction-Nonfiction Pairs
Text-based questions
Close Reading strategies (ie, *Using Anchor Questions with “signposts” for Contrasts & Contradiction; Aha
Moments; Tough Questions; Words of the Wiser; Again & Again; and Memory Moment)
Gra