Description
Physical Design and Addressing Strategy
Provide a physical design for HHS. Using any additional resources you find helpful, create a physical design and IP addressing strategy for your new network infrastructure. Analyze and design a network topology that displays basic server placement and segmentation to support a reliable network.
As part of this redesign, you are asked to evaluate the existing infrastructure and make any and all improvements you believe are appropriate to improve the cost and efficiency of managing the network.
To prepare for this assignment, do the following:
- Complete the required virtual labs for this week.
- Research this topic and include at least three references from articles, books, or Web sites to support your paper.
Your completed design should include the following:
- Design a physical topology that is appropriate for the organization. Your discussion and design should correlate with the organization description that you provided last week.
- Create a diagram that displays a site plan from a physical design perspective, including design components related to topology, device selection, and placement choices.
- Write an analysis of your physical design, providing appropriate rationale for the chosen topology and device placement.
- Design an IPv4 strategy that represents the new architecture; include decisions relative to subnetting, class, and type of addresses used.
- Analyze a strategy for IP addressing and subnetting that is appropriate for HHS.
- Design an IPv6 scheme using your IPv4 strategy and apply it to your network.
- Compare and contrast IPv4 and IPv6 addressing and subnetting.
- Describe IP configuration steps for Windows Server 2012 and HHS, including any special considerations or circumstances that must be addressed.
- Describe how the concepts and activities presented in the labs for this week supported your addressing strategy.
Make sure that your paper is professionally written and free of errors and that APA formatting is applied throughout. When it is complete, submit your assignment.
Physical Design and Addressing Strategy
Scoring Guide
Due Date: End of Unit 2.
Percentage of Course Grade: 10%.
Physical Design and Addressing Strategy Scoring Guide Grading Rubric
Criteria
Nonperformance
Basic
Proficient
Distinguished
Design a physical topology
that is appropriate for an
organization.
11%
Does not
design a
physical
topology that
is appropriate
for an
organization.
Designs a
physical
topology that
is somewhat
appropriate
for an
organization.
Designs a
physical
topology that
is
appropriate
for an
organization.
Designs a
physical
topology that is
most
appropriate for
an
organization.
Create a diagram that
displays a site plan from a
physical design perspective,
including design components
related to topology, device
selection, and placement
choices.
11%
Does not
create a
diagram that
displays a
site plan
from a
physical
design
perspective,
including the
design
components
related to
topology,
device
selection, and
placement
choices.
Creates a
diagram that
partially
displays a site
plan from a
physical
design
perspective,
partially
including the
design
components
related to
topology,
device
selection, and
placement
choices.
Creates a
diagram that
displays a
site plan
from a
physical
design
perspective,
including the
design
components
related to
topology,
device
selection,
and
placement
choices.
Creates a
detailed
diagram that
most
effectively
displays a site
plan from a
physical design
perspective,
including all of
the necessary
design
components
related to
topology,
device
selection, and
placement
choices.
Analyze a physical design,
providing appropriate
rationale for the chosen
topology and device
placement.
11%
Does not
analyze a
physical
design that
provided
appropriate
rationale for
Describes
somewhat
appropriately
a physical
design,
providing
somewhat
Analyzes a
physical
design,
providing
appropriate
rationale for
the chosen
Analyzes in
detail a
physical
design,
providing
insightful and
most
Physical Design and Addressing Strategy Scoring Guide Grading Rubric
Criteria
Nonperformance
the chosen
topology and
device
placement.
Basic
appropriate
rationale for
the chosen
topology and
device
placement.
Designs a
partial or
Does not
somewhat
design an
accurate IPv4
Design an IPv4 strategy that IPv4 strategy strategy that
effectively represents the new that
partially
architecture.
effectively
represents the
11%
represents
new
the new
architecture
architecture. or that is
missing
information.
Proficient
Distinguished
topology and appropriate
device
rationale for
placement.
the chosen
topology and
device
placement.
Designs an
IPv4 strategy
that most
effectively
Designs an
represents the
IPv4 strategy
new
that
architecture
effectively
and includes
represents
decisions
the new
relative to
architecture.
subnetting,
class, and type
of addresses
used.
Analyzes
effectively an
ideal strategy
Does not
Describes
Analyzes
for IP
analyze
somewhat
effectively a
addressing and
Analyze effectively a strategy effectively a effectively a strategy for
subnetting for
for IP addressing and
strategy for
strategy for
IP
an
subnetting for an
IP addressing IP addressing addressing
organization,
organization.
and
and
and
showing great
11%
subnetting
subnetting for subnetting
insight into
for an
an
for an
addressing and
organization. organization. organization.
subnetting
Windows
networks.
Convert an IPv4 scheme into
an accurate IPv6 scheme.
12%
Does not
convert an
IPv4 scheme
into an
accurate IPv6
scheme.
Converts
partially an
IPv4 scheme
into a
somewhat
Converts an
IPv4 scheme
into an
accurate
IPv6
scheme.
Converts a
IPv4 scheme
into an
accurate,
comprehensive,
Physical Design and Addressing Strategy Scoring Guide Grading Rubric
Criteria
Nonperformance
Basic
Proficient
accurate IPv6
scheme.
Distinguished
and advanced
IPv6 scheme.
Describes in
detail IP
configuration
Does not
Lists IP
steps most
Describes IP
describe IP
configuration
accurate for
configuration
configuration steps partially
Windows
Describe IP configuration
steps
steps
accurate for
Server and
steps accurate for Windows
accurate for
accurate for Windows
most
Server and appropriate for an
Windows
Windows
Server and
appropriate for
organization.
Server and
Server and
somewhat
an
11%
appropriate
appropriate
appropriate
organization,
for an
for an
for an
showing
organization.
organization. organization.
superior insight
into the
organization’s
needs.
Does not
describe the
way in which
Describe the way in which the the concepts
concepts and activities
and activities
presented in a lab scenario presented in
supports a network redesign a lab scenario
addressing strategy.
support a
11%
network
redesign
addressing
strategy.
Follow APA style and
formatting guidelines for
resources and citations and
create a document that is
clearly written and generally
free of grammatical errors.
11%
Does not
follow APA
style and
formatting
guidelines
for resources
and citations
and does not
create a
Lists partially
the way in
which the
concepts and
activities
presented in a
lab scenario
support a
network
redesign
addressing
strategy.
Describes
the way in
which the
concepts and
activities
presented in
a lab
scenario
support a
network
redesign
addressing
strategy.
Describes in
great detail the
way in which
the concepts
and activities
presented in a
lab scenario
support a
network
redesign
addressing
strategy.
Inconsistently
follows APA
style and
format
guidelines for
resources and
citations and
creates a
document
Follows
APA style
and
formatting
guidelines
for resources
and citations
and creates a
document
Follows APA
style and
formatting
guidelines for
resources and
citations and
creates a
document that
is clearly
Physical Design and Addressing Strategy Scoring Guide Grading Rubric
Criteria
Nonperformance
document
that is clearly
written and
generally
free of
grammatical
errors.
Basic
Proficient
Distinguished
that is
somewhat
well written,
with some
grammatical
errors.
that is clearly
written and
generally
free of
grammatical
errors.
written, well
organized, and
completely free
of grammatical
errors.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Scoring Guide
Due Date: End of Unit 2.
Percentage of Course Grade: 10%.
Physical Design and Addressing Strategy Scoring Guide Grading Rubric
Criteria
Nonperformance
Basic
Proficient
Distinguished
Design a physical topology
that is appropriate for an
organization.
11%
Does not
design a
physical
topology that
is appropriate
for an
organization.
Designs a
physical
topology that
is somewhat
appropriate
for an
organization.
Designs a
physical
topology that
is
appropriate
for an
organization.
Designs a
physical
topology that is
most
appropriate for
an
organization.
Create a diagram that
displays a site plan from a
physical design perspective,
including design components
related to topology, device
selection, and placement
choices.
11%
Does not
create a
diagram that
displays a
site plan
from a
physical
design
perspective,
including the
design
components
related to
topology,
device
selection, and
placement
choices.
Creates a
diagram that
partially
displays a site
plan from a
physical
design
perspective,
partially
including the
design
components
related to
topology,
device
selection, and
placement
choices.
Creates a
diagram that
displays a
site plan
from a
physical
design
perspective,
including the
design
components
related to
topology,
device
selection,
and
placement
choices.
Creates a
detailed
diagram that
most
effectively
displays a site
plan from a
physical design
perspective,
including all of
the necessary
design
components
related to
topology,
device
selection, and
placement
choices.
Analyze a physical design,
providing appropriate
rationale for the chosen
topology and device
placement.
11%
Does not
analyze a
physical
design that
provided
appropriate
rationale for
Describes
somewhat
appropriately
a physical
design,
providing
somewhat
Analyzes a
physical
design,
providing
appropriate
rationale for
the chosen
Analyzes in
detail a
physical
design,
providing
insightful and
most
Physical Design and Addressing Strategy Scoring Guide Grading Rubric
Criteria
Nonperformance
the chosen
topology and
device
placement.
Basic
appropriate
rationale for
the chosen
topology and
device
placement.
Designs a
partial or
Does not
somewhat
design an
accurate IPv4
Design an IPv4 strategy that IPv4 strategy strategy that
effectively represents the new that
partially
architecture.
effectively
represents the
11%
represents
new
the new
architecture
architecture. or that is
missing
information.
Proficient
Distinguished
topology and appropriate
device
rationale for
placement.
the chosen
topology and
device
placement.
Designs an
IPv4 strategy
that most
effectively
Designs an
represents the
IPv4 strategy
new
that
architecture
effectively
and includes
represents
decisions
the new
relative to
architecture.
subnetting,
class, and type
of addresses
used.
Analyzes
effectively an
ideal strategy
Does not
Describes
Analyzes
for IP
analyze
somewhat
effectively a
addressing and
Analyze effectively a strategy effectively a effectively a strategy for
subnetting for
for IP addressing and
strategy for
strategy for
IP
an
subnetting for an
IP addressing IP addressing addressing
organization,
organization.
and
and
and
showing great
11%
subnetting
subnetting for subnetting
insight into
for an
an
for an
addressing and
organization. organization. organization.
subnetting
Windows
networks.
Convert an IPv4 scheme into
an accurate IPv6 scheme.
12%
Does not
convert an
IPv4 scheme
into an
accurate IPv6
scheme.
Converts
partially an
IPv4 scheme
into a
somewhat
Converts an
IPv4 scheme
into an
accurate
IPv6
scheme.
Converts a
IPv4 scheme
into an
accurate,
comprehensive,
Physical Design and Addressing Strategy Scoring Guide Grading Rubric
Criteria
Nonperformance
Basic
Proficient
accurate IPv6
scheme.
Distinguished
and advanced
IPv6 scheme.
Describes in
detail IP
configuration
Does not
Lists IP
steps most
Describes IP
describe IP
configuration
accurate for
configuration
configuration steps partially
Windows
Describe IP configuration
steps
steps
accurate for
Server and
steps accurate for Windows
accurate for
accurate for Windows
most
Server and appropriate for an
Windows
Windows
Server and
appropriate for
organization.
Server and
Server and
somewhat
an
11%
appropriate
appropriate
appropriate
organization,
for an
for an
for an
showing
organization.
organization. organization.
superior insight
into the
organization’s
needs.
Does not
describe the
way in which
Describe the way in which the the concepts
concepts and activities
and activities
presented in a lab scenario presented in
supports a network redesign a lab scenario
addressing strategy.
support a
11%
network
redesign
addressing
strategy.
Follow APA style and
formatting guidelines for
resources and citations and
create a document that is
clearly written and generally
free of grammatical errors.
11%
Does not
follow APA
style and
formatting
guidelines
for resources
and citations
and does not
create a
Lists partially
the way in
which the
concepts and
activities
presented in a
lab scenario
support a
network
redesign
addressing
strategy.
Describes
the way in
which the
concepts and
activities
presented in
a lab
scenario
support a
network
redesign
addressing
strategy.
Describes in
great detail the
way in which
the concepts
and activities
presented in a
lab scenario
support a
network
redesign
addressing
strategy.
Inconsistently
follows APA
style and
format
guidelines for
resources and
citations and
creates a
document
Follows
APA style
and
formatting
guidelines
for resources
and citations
and creates a
document
Follows APA
style and
formatting
guidelines for
resources and
citations and
creates a
document that
is clearly
Physical Design and Addressing Strategy Scoring Guide Grading Rubric
Criteria
Nonperformance
document
that is clearly
written and
generally
free of
grammatical
errors.
Basic
Proficient
Distinguished
that is
somewhat
well written,
with some
grammatical
errors.
that is clearly
written and
generally
free of
grammatical
errors.
written, well
organized, and
completely free
of grammatical
errors.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Categories: