Description
Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies
Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies
New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after
careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of
positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.
Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are
often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting
existing research to inform their thinking.
In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After
reviewing, you will summarize your findings.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within
the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical
systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to
improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support
patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”
Identify and select 5 peer-reviewed articles from your research.
The Assignment: (4-5 pages)
In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the
following:
Identify the 5 peer-reviewed articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.
Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from
the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide
examples.
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings
List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.).
Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Chapter 14, “The Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics” (pp. 267–287)
Chapter 15, “Informatics Tools to Promote Patient Safety and Quality Outcomes” (pp. 293–317)
Chapter 16, “Patient Engagement and Connected Health” (pp. 323–338)
Chapter 17, “Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health” (pp. 341–355)
Chapter 18, “Telenursing and Remote Access Telehealth” (pp. 359–388)
Dykes, P. C., Rozenblum, R., Dalal, A., Massaro, A., Chang, F., Clements, M., Collins, S. …Bates, D. W.
(2017). Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care:
The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and
Technology Study. Critical Care Medicine, 45(8), e806–e813. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002449
HealthIT.gov. (2018c). What is an electronic health record (EHR)? Retrieved from
https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr
Healthcare Information Management and Systems Society. (2018). Electronic health records. Retrieved
from https://www.himss.org/library/ehr/
Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018). Leveraging interactive
patient care technology to Improve pain management engagement. Pain Management Nursing, 19(3),
212–221. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2017.11.002
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Skiba, D. (2017). Evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applications. Informatics, 4(3), 32–
40. doi:10.3390/informatics4030032
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Public Health Informatics [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Accessible player
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Electronic Records and Managing IT Change [Video file].
Baltimore, MD: Author.
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the
following:
· Properly identify 5 peer-reviewed articles selected.
· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned
from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide
examples.
77 (77%) – 85 (85%)
The responses accurately and clearly identify 5 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.
The responses accurately and thoroughly summarize in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail
the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical
system each peer-reviewed article described.
Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.
68 (68%) – 76 (76%)
The responses identify 5 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.
The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies,
and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described.
Accurate examples are provided which support the responses provided.
60 (60%) – 67 (67%)
The responses vaguely or inaccurately identify 5 or less peer-reviewed articles for the Assignment.
The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies,
and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described that
is vague or inaccurate.
Examples provided to support the responses are vague or inaccurate.
0 (0%) – 59 (59%)
The responses vaguely and inaccurately identify less than 5 peer-reviewed articles for the Assignment,
or are missing.
The responses vaguely and inaccurately summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to
outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peerreviewed article described, or are missing.
Examples provided to support the responses are vague and inaccurate, or are missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate
continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking
substance.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the
time.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s
understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font,
spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and
reference list.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after
careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of
positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.
Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are
often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting
existing research to inform their thinking.
In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After
reviewing, you will summarize your findings.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within
the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical
systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to
improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support
patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”
Identify and select 5 peer-reviewed articles from your research.
The Assignment: (4-5 pages)
In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the
following:
Identify the 5 peer-reviewed articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.
Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from
the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide
examples.
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings
List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.).
Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Chapter 14, “The Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics” (pp. 267–287)
Chapter 15, “Informatics Tools to Promote Patient Safety and Quality Outcomes” (pp. 293–317)
Chapter 16, “Patient Engagement and Connected Health” (pp. 323–338)
Chapter 17, “Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health” (pp. 341–355)
Chapter 18, “Telenursing and Remote Access Telehealth” (pp. 359–388)
Dykes, P. C., Rozenblum, R., Dalal, A., Massaro, A., Chang, F., Clements, M., Collins, S. …Bates, D. W.
(2017). Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care:
The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and
Technology Study. Critical Care Medicine, 45(8), e806–e813. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002449
HealthIT.gov. (2018c). What is an electronic health record (EHR)? Retrieved from
https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr
Healthcare Information Management and Systems Society. (2018). Electronic health records. Retrieved
from https://www.himss.org/library/ehr/
Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018). Leveraging interactive
patient care technology to Improve pain management engagement. Pain Management Nursing, 19(3),
212–221. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2017.11.002
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Skiba, D. (2017). Evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applications. Informatics, 4(3), 32–
40. doi:10.3390/informatics4030032
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Public Health Informatics [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Accessible player
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Electronic Records and Managing IT Change [Video file].
Baltimore, MD: Author.
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the
following:
· Properly identify 5 peer-reviewed articles selected.
· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned
from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide
examples.
77 (77%) – 85 (85%)
The responses accurately and clearly identify 5 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.
The responses accurately and thoroughly summarize in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail
the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical
system each peer-reviewed article described.
Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.
68 (68%) – 76 (76%)
The responses identify 5 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.
The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies,
and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described.
Accurate examples are provided which support the responses provided.
60 (60%) – 67 (67%)
The responses vaguely or inaccurately identify 5 or less peer-reviewed articles for the Assignment.
The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies,
and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described that
is vague or inaccurate.
Examples provided to support the responses are vague or inaccurate.
0 (0%) – 59 (59%)
The responses vaguely and inaccurately identify less than 5 peer-reviewed articles for the Assignment,
or are missing.
The responses vaguely and inaccurately summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to
outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peerreviewed article described, or are missing.
Examples provided to support the responses are vague and inaccurate, or are missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate
continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking
substance.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the
time.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s
understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font,
spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and
reference list.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Categories: